Has An RC-135U Combat Sent Signal Intelligence Aircraft “Covered” The Two F-35A Stealth Jets Visiting Estonia?

Apr 26 2017 - 14 Comments

Yesterday two USAF F-35A stealth aircraft performed a quick visit to Estonia. But their mission to the Baltic region was probably not only supported by a KC-135: an RC-135U and two RC-135Ws flew to the area while the 5th Gen. jets were there.

On Apr. 25, two U.S. Air Force F-35As belonging to the 34th Fighter Squadron, from Hill Air Force Base, Utah, deployed to the UK since mid April, flew from RAF Lakenheath, UK, to Ämari, Estonia.

Based on the information gathered by aircraft spotters, airband listeners and ADS-B monitors, who tracked the mission to Estonia of the F-35s, the two 5th generation multirole combat aircraft , 14-5102 and 14-5094, using radio callsign “Conan 01” and accompanied by “Quid 89”, a 100ARW KC-135 from RAF Mildenhall, departed from RAF Lakenheath at 07.35z.

The trio landed in Estonia shortly before 11.00z and took part in a brief ceremony (at this link you can find some interesting photographs).

Noteworthy, the quick visit to Estonia was “accompanied” by a rather unusual activity of U.S. and British spyplanes in the Baltic region.

In fact, as the F-35s headed towards Amari in formation with their KC-135 tanker, as many as three RC-135s (including a RAF bird) operated in the airspaces over or close to Estonia.

The U.S. Air Force dispatched an RC-135W Rivet Joint 62-4139 “Haiti 79” and an RC-135U Combat Sent 64-14847 “Spool 06” to the Baltic states.

The Rivet Joint positioned off Kaliningrad Oblast, where some of the most active Russian bases in the Baltic region are located, whereas the Combat Sent started a racetrack over Estonia, not far from the border with mainland Russia.

 

Shortly thereafter, even a RAF RC-135W “Airseeker,” one of the three ex-USAF KC-135 tanker converted to the Rivet Joint variant starting back in 2011, from RAF Waddington joined the scene. The British intelligence gathering plane that, just like the American “RJs” is equipped with all sorts of antennae and sensors, to eavesdrop enemy signals, transmissions, detect frequencies used by radio and radars and pinpoint sites of interest, mobile stations, SAM batteries, etc., maintained a racetrack off Kaliningrad.

RC135W ZZ664 RRR7220 west of Kaliningrad (via @CivMilAir)

At 14.43Z, the two JSFs departed Ämari to return to the UK and shortly thereafter both the U.S. and RAF spyplanes headed back to their homebases.

Although we can’t but speculate here, it appears to be quite likely that the RC-135 missions to the Baltic were somehow related to the deployment of the F-35 so close to the Russian border. In fact, whilst Rivet Joint and Combat Sent aircraft regularly fly to the region and can be daily tracked online as they head towards the international airspace off Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia, the presence of three such spyplanes not too far away from one another seems to suggest their missions were coordinated and probably related to something “big” happening there.

And the only “big thing” (Zapad 2017 preparation aside) we are currently aware of is the first presence of the JSF in Estonia. Moreover, not only was the type of racetrack flown by the Combat Sent unusual, but it was also located in a pretty interesting position: east of Ämari, as if the RC-135U, an aircraft designed to collect technical intelligence on adversary radar emitter systems, was there to detect emissions from Russian radars interested in the F-35.

However, there is another possibility: what if the American and British spyplanes were there to deter the Russian from using their radars?

Indeed, whilst three RC-135s flying at the same time in the same area is something unusual, it is quite weird that the three spyplanes had their ADS-B transponder turned on during their missions.

“If they wanted to hide, they would do” says the ADS-B / ModeS tracking enthusiast who runs the popular @CivMilAir and @ADSBTweetBot Twitter feeds. “The daily RC-135s flights over the Middle East very rarely show up and even the daily missions to the Baltics can usually be tracked during their transit to the area of operations, where often the transponder is turned off. That’s why I believe they remained trackable on purpose.”

Spyplanes, including the U-Boat (as the RC-135U Combat Sent is nicknamed in the pilot community), usually operate in “due regard” with transponder switched off, with no radio comms with the ATC control, using the concept of “see and avoid” where the pilot flying is responsible for avoiding all traffic conflicts. Even if RC-135s can be regularly tracked online, they tend to keep a low-profile when reaching the area of operations, turning off the ADS-B to avoid being detected at least by commercial ADS-B receivers like those feeding online flight tracking systems such as Flightradar24.com, PlaneFinder.net or Global ADS Exchange.

On Apr. 25, both RC-135s could tracked throughout their missions suggesting they did purposely broadcast their position for everyone to see, to let everyone know they were there.

Russian spyplanes have done pretty much the same in the past: the Tu-214R, Russia’s most advanced intelligence gathering aircraft deployed to Syria and flew along the border with Ukraine with its transponder turned on. In that case it was a sort of “show of force”; yesterday was likely a way to prevent some interesting details about the F-35 to be gathered by the Russians.

By the way, it’s not the first time U.S. stealth jets flying to the Baltics are directly or undirectly “accompanied” by Rivet Joints: on Apr. 27, 2016, two F-22s deployed to Siauliai Air Base, Lithuania. Supported (so to say) by an RC-135W.

H/T to @CivMilAir, @MIL_Radar, Fighter Control forum

Top image credit: Tim Felce (Airwolfhound) via Wiki Commons

 

Salva

Salva

Salva

  • leroy

    Good, thorough report. Since the F-35s in Estonia have their radar reflectors deployed, the Russians will be allowed no data on the stealth fighter’s RCS. And the Russians shouldn’t bother looking for signals from the APG-81 either because the U.S. has no intention of handing them over to Russian electronic detection sensors.

    As for the Russians, go ahead and turn on every radar you’ve got in an attempt to gather ELINT on the JSF. These U.S./NATO electronics intelligence gathering aircraft, as well as the advanced sensor suite on the F-35 itself, will be happy to vacuum up all the information we trick you into providing.

    Heck the F-35 can just sit on the apron at Amari and vacuum up tons of SIGNIT from that location. This plane is a voracious signals-gatherer, and it will be happy to record any and all electrons you emit. It carries a BIG threat library system, and donations of information for addition to its mission data files are now being gladly accepted. Unlike Apple’s iTunes Store, we won’t pay you a dime for “downloading” them. Sorry – no rubles for you! : )

    • InklingBooks

      So the F-35 has “radar reflectors” to make it more visible and confound those trying to penetrate its stealth? I thought as much. I even wonder if we’ve got reflectors that make one aircraft look like another. One that’d make a tiny drone look like a B-52 could be most useful. Fly in, trigger a massive response by air defenses, collapse/drop/destruct that reflector, and slip quietly away.

      I’ve read about the Allied use of radio and radar in WWII. I’ve been disappointed that we apparently never filled the fuselage of a few Mosquitos with large corner reflectors to make them look like a squadron of B-17s. Fly toward the Rhineland, send a lot of Me109s into the air, then collapse those reflectors and head for home. Repeat nightly. When the Germans get lazy, send them the Mosquitos in again, but this time with those B-17s.

      “In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” —Winston Churchill

      My hunch is that Russia is playing the same game. We won’t see their anti-stealth technology until its existence inflicts genuine pain on us. That bothers me.

      • Uniform223

        “I even wonder if we’ve got reflectors that make one aircraft look like another. One that’d make a tiny drone look like a B-52 could be most useful.”

        The USAF had something similar to what you are talking about back in the late 50s and early 60s.

        ADM-20 Quail
        http://davidwoolsey.com/roadtrip99/photos/week1/photos/DSC00033.JPG

        Also it is my understanding that the Eurofighter Typhoon uses a towed decoy.

      • Pacemaker4

        like MH 370? that kind ?

  • David Coston

    Great opportunity to map the radar/sam environment. They are likely operating at full power, blasting away in hopes of catching an F-35.

    They know Putin will try to make some kind of propaganda out of the whole thing and we can use that against them in a tactical sense. At least that’s what I would do.

  • WinstonSmith2012

    When code names could be misinterpreted in a title, like “Combat Sent”, either omit them or place them in parenthesis. I read the title multiple times trying to figure out what the heck it meant.

  • Uniform223

    Russian radar operator 1 – “I heard that new americanski stealth jet is going to Estonia…”

    Russian radar operator 2 – “really!? What are you waiting for. Turn the damn thing on and look for it tovarishch! We could get medals and promotions”

    *a few hours later*

    Russian radar operator 1 – “I can’t find the damn thing but there are those pesky American signal spy planes again. Hmm… there’s 2 of them. What should I do?

    Russian radar operator 2 – “I can’t find it either. Maybe we should turn off or stuff so they don’t get our signal. Wait, when did you first spot those planes?”

    Russian radar operator 1 – “about 30 minutes ago. Why?”

  • veej7485

    prob so they didnt turn on…if they did turn on, its a win win.

  • Steve Worral

    I have Flight Radar but it only shows commercial acft. What program includes military acft?

  • juretrn

    So basically: turn on your radars if you dare?

  • Corporate Kitten

    Can someone explain the downside for Russia having their radar on?

    I’m sure NATO forces already know their location as Kaliningrad is fairly small.

    • wGraves

      I once had to explain to a civilian that you don’t choose to go to war on a moment’s notice. Wars are won by planning and logistics. You have to map the enemy’s deployment and come up with a strategic and derivative tactical plan. For air superiority, you need an EOB (Electronic Order of Battle). It will determine what you attack, in what order, and with which assets. This mission appears to have been a part of battlefield preparation.

      In a sense, this is a response to Putin’s flying his bombers off of Alaska. But there’s no real equivalency, because they rely on an integrated SAM defense system, while we rely on air-to-air engagement. So they have a lot more trouble mapping us and inferring what we would do. The US hasn’t had an integrated SAM system since NIKE was retired. Our coastlines are just too extensive. So we field one heck of an Air Force instead. The Russians, who have physical borders adjacent to their adversaries, have extensive SAM installations with areal integration. We can hopefully crack their systems, but we have to map them first, instead of taking pot shots at individual targets.

      One very interesting recent event was the ability of our Tomahawks to penetrate the integrated Russian air defense system in Syria. I don’t know if the operators were asleep or what, but our stuff went through their defensive pickets like tissue paper. Go USA! Putin may be a little worried about the messaging, because it would apply to their forces in Europe as well. Mattis to Putin:

      “I come in peace. I didn’t bring artillery. But I’m pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you fuck with me, I’ll kill you all.”

      • rats123

        The Tomahawks were so awesome that over 30 didn’t make their target! They did so much damage to the airfield that the Syrian air force conducted raids on terrorists positions later that day. Those Tomahawks were just so awesome!

  • Marcus Åkesson

    No, FR24 blocks almost all MIL flights.