A Russian Air Force Tu-214R is about to land at Latakia, Syria.
The Tu-214R is a Russian ISR (Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance) aircraft. In other words, a quite advanced spyplane.
As we have already explained here in the past, it is a special mission aircraft equipped with all-weather radar systems and electro optical sensors that produce photo-like imagery of a large parts of the ground: these images are then used to identify and map the position of the enemy forces, even if these are camouflaged or hidden.
The aircraft is known to carry sensor packages to perform ELINT (Electronic Intelligence) and SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) missions: the antennae of the Tu-214R can intercept the signals emitted by the enemy systems (radars, aircraft, radios, combat vehicles, mobile phones etc) so as it can build the EOB (Electronic Order of Battle) of the enemy forces: where the enemy forces are operating, what kind of equipment they are using and, by eavesdropping into their radio/phone communications, what they are doing and what will be their next move.
The aircraft is built by KAPO (Kazan Aircraft Production Association) and flown from the company’s airfield in Kazan.
On Feb. 15, the Tu-214R registered RA-64514, serial number 42305014, the second of the two examples of this kind of aircraft built under contract with Russia’s Ministry of Defense, flew from Kazan to Latakia airbase, Syria.
Image credit: Flightradar24.com
With its ADS-B transponder signals broadcast in the clear and detected by Flightradar24 collecting stations, the aircraft could be tracked as it followed the eastern corridor from Russia, to the Caspian Sea and then to Syria via the Iranian and Iraqi airspaces. It’s not clear whether the aircraft has already been delivered to the Russian Air Force, even though it is quite weird that a developmental aircraft is deployed abroad (unless the reason is testing it at war in a real scenario…).
While it was still under development, the same Tu-214R aircraft flew what appeared to be an operative mission on Jun. 18, 2015, when it flew from Kazan to Crimea and back, closely following the border between Russia and Ukraine, most probably testing some of its sensors against real targets.
Previously, the aircraft was spotted flying near Crimea.Interestingly, while over the Caspian Sea, approaching the Iranian airspace, the Tu-214R performed a couple of 360° turns at 33.000 feet (weird, while enroute): maybe it was working on the diplomatic clearence to enter Iran?
Continuing south, approaching Iran…
Russian Air Force SIGINT a/c #RA64514 pic.twitter.com/G8zkaR5xQd
— Civ & Mil Air ✈ (@CivMilAir) 15 February 2016
It was circling because it was “LISTENING”. Tthat is its design objective: Be in the area of interest and “listen”. In the specific case, there are plenty of US bases in northern Iraq, to listen to.
Are those modern high by-pass turbofan engines?
I guess you mean thrust to weight ratio (not ‘trust’).. so far I can only trust that you are failing to support with evidence what you say, I hope you understand that aggressive and erratic style of your answers can’t replace the facts. So lets go to the facts again..
Some characteristics of the Su-35 engine are classified and that’s why I used thrust as an indicator of the engine’s performance, but the weight of the previous version of this engine is well known – 3350lb so assuming this weight, (reality is that AL41F – Su-35 engine – is a deep modernisation of the previous AL31F with the 80% of aggregates/parts completely re-designed, new configuration, alloys and etc) so the mass I expect to be less, but anyway it gives us T/W of 32000/3350 = 9.55 which is again better than Typhoons engine 20000/2180 = 9.17 (attention here, unlike you I quote the source again, rolls-royce web site: http://www.rolls-royce.com/products-and-services/defence-aerospace/products/combat-jets/ej200.aspx#engine-specifications)
You have also conviniently ignored another fact: 12 to 0 Typhoon loss to the Su-30MKI (which is by all means inferior to Su-35) in the IAF/RAF exercise, I wonder why?)
Here is some more listings form the public sources that all put Typhoon below Su-35 by T/W:
One more thing, you don’t need to reply, I will understand. My objective here is not to be right, or proove that Su-35 is better than Typhoon or vice versa, I just don’t want other people to get confused and show that there is a difference between facts and twisted facts…