
As already mentioned earlier on The Aviationist (especially when discussing the famous claims by the German Eurofighter Typhoon pilots at Red Flag Alaska 2012) in November 2009, some 1st Fighter Wing’s Raptors from Langley AFB, flew to Al Dhafra, in the UAE, to train with the French Air Force Rafales and the RAF Typhoons during exercise ATLC 2009.
The episode is quite famous because in late December of the same year the French Ministry of Defense released the captures taken by the Rafale’s OSF (Optronique Secteur Frontal) showing an F-22 in aerial combat. In fact, although the U.S. Air Force pilots told that their plane was undefeated during the exercise, the French were killed once in six 1 vs 1 WVR (Within Visual Range) engagements versus the F-22 (the other 5 ended with a “draw”) and one Raptor was claimed as killed by a UAE Mirage 2000 during a mock engagement.
However, the following interesting video just made available by the French website http://portail-aviation.
HUD or sensors’ captures and videos are no more than marketing stuff because, unless the scenario and ROE are known, it is impossible to say when the alleged kill took place, what was happening before and after, which was the tactics.
Nevertheless, the video shows that the Rafale is almost comparable to the F-22 especially when maneuvering at low speed during close air combat.
By the way, when we talk about maneuverability, we can’t but mention the Su-35 Flanker-E and its stunning display at Le Bourget.
Very interesting. Its unknown if the missile would have hit though. Lock is not enough.
How would you go about testing that?
Physics and live fire tests, really. Many times a seeker will be able to gain a lock before the missile is kinematically able to hit it’s target. Then once it is, live fire tests can give data as to what probability the missile has of hitting its target based on launch parameters. So, I’d imagine for an exercise a simulated “kill” could either require the launch” to be above a certain kill percentage or a computer could possibly return a random “hit” or “miss” indication based on the probability a real missile would hit said target.
That was interesting. Am I to understand the F-22 still had underwing tanks on board?
Hi Tom,
Actually, other footage released during the engagements clearly shows the Raptor didn’t carry the external fuel tanks.
See here:
https://theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/f-22-targeted.jpg
and here:
http://patriceayme.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/f22-captured-2ak1.jpg
If you look at the video in the post, you can see the F-22 doesn’t carry any external store either
Fox2 kill and then Gun Kill, nice !
Except the Rafale scored kill was disqualified here. He continued to engage after the engagement was ordered halted for safety reasons. The Rafale’s fuel was too low to safely continue.
– At no time did the French claim that this was a F-22 kill.
Not the French air force, nor the French magazine.
– Why? Because this is just an image from OSF’s TV sensor,
not HUD footage. In a combat setting this might have been a missile kill, but
since the F-22 and Rafale only did gun engagements, this was taken outside of a
combat setting.
I never said the French claimed any victories. Alsp, this engagement started was started by giving the Rafale an unrealistic favorable advantage starting close up on the Raptor’s 6 oclock when the pilot called out “fight on”. Highly unlikely any pilot would find themselves in this kind of advantage in real combat today against any modern foe.. Also, these Raptors were equipped with transponders to defeat their Stealth advantage so the Rafale’s can track and lock onto them for a simulated missile kill. The USAF loves to put their pilots in underdog situation and force them to work their way out of it. Pilots win wars not planes.
David, you forgot to mention that the F-22 was carrying drop tanks during all of this.
That’s what the US press said to justify the fact that the Rafale where on par with them. The french said it was BS and it’s clear it was now that the F-22 in the video clearly doesn’t carry any.
No.
Raptor didn’t carry the external fuel tanks.
See here:
https://theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/f-22-targeted.jpg
and here:
http://patriceayme.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/f22-captured-2ak1.jpg
I saw f 22 did not carry any fuel tank. I am confusing because why the rafale’s pilot requested termination ??? What is going on ?? Please help me. I am not a French.
You guys do know this f-22 has external fuel tanks on right?
Makes this a joke to be honest
Exactly, all sites that mentioned this video “forgot” to say that Raptor was using external fuel tanks, on purpose.
Actually, other footage released during the engagement clearly shows the Raptor didn’t carry the external fuel tanks.
See here:
https://theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/f-22-targeted.jpg
and here:
http://patriceayme.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/f22-captured-2ak1.jpg
You do know this Rafale has external fuel tanks on right?
It makes it even.