
Although the military campaign in Mali is still in progress, we can already draw some of the lessons the French Armed Force may have learned from this low intensity air war.
1) The need for more ISR platforms: The French Air Force operates three Harfang drones, two of those are deployed in Niger. Usually, five drones are required to keep two CAP orbits active on a 24-hour basis.
So far, the Harfang drones have been used to support French special missions, providing surveillance in the vicinity of the airfields and cities about to be taken by the paratroopers (as videos published on The Aviationist show). You need many more UAVs to look for rebels, track suspicious activity and support convoys/special ops across large territories as Central and North Mali.
Furthermore, French drones are not armed and manned bombers are required to strike ground targets identified by the Harfangs. For all the above mentioned reasons, the help of U.S. drones (some of those are weaponized MQ-1s) is paramount.
Last but not least, French planners are in desperate need to track rebel movements. For this reason a British Sentinel R.1 is supporting the operation from Senegal and the U.S. has allegedly offered an E-8 JSTARS.
2) There’s a problem with tankers. Even if only a few combat planes are involved in the air strikes, the French Air Force is not equipped with a tanker force capable to sustain a limited amount of attack sorties. That’s why the U.S. has dispatched some of its KC-135s from RAF Mildenhall and other nations have offered aerial refuelers.
Furthermore, Operation Serval (a relatively small campaign) had to rely on the help of foreign countries that dispatched their airlifters to help the French moving equipment and personnel to Mali. Front line combat planes have to be supported with cargo planes sorties.
3) The current order of battle of the French Air Force in Mali includes six Mirage 2000Ds, six Rafale jets, two Mirage F1CRs, four tankers, two drones, and C-160, C-130 and CN235 operating from Bamako, Ndjamena, Niamey, Dakar or Abidjan.
As happened in Libya, the Mali air war will probably reaffirm the need for low-cost/cheaper combat planes: the Rafale is a multirole aircraft that can carry a wide variety of weapons and pods, including a reconnaissance pod. But it is also quite expensive in terms of cost per flight hour as the majority of the most modern fighters.
The fact that the French Air Force is flying the Mirage F1CR in theater helps containing the cost of prolonged operations abroad.
4) Even if Mirage 2000 and Rafale have flown with PGMs (Precision Guided Munitions); still, not only heavy (and costly) weapons are needed in Mali, given the amount of soft above ground targets.
That’s why Mirage F1CR have been operating with four Mk-82s, 500-lb unguided, low-drag general-purpose bombs, equipped with a DSU-33 airburst fuze: the fuze is used to initiate detonation at a preprogrammed heigh-of-burst (HOB) enhancing the performance of the rather basic (and cheap) bomb.
Image credit: French MoD
Sounds essentially correct, but you seem to imply that UAS are the only ISR platform. One interesting feature of the Mali air campaign you do not mention has been the use of several (up to 4 or 5) MPA ATL-2, both as an ISR platform and as a strike platform, firing GBU-12s. They’re obviously not in the French AF OOB, but still contribute to the air war.
Thanks for your coverage!
As a Libyan I’m very curious, are there any lessons the Libyan airforce can learn from this as it will have to operate in the same type of environment and against similar sorts of targets. Your expert view would be very interesting as Libya is at a crucial juncture now, rebuilding it’s airforce from scratch.
So far our skilled mechanics have refurbished and repaired some of our old cold war era aircraft (you can see more on the Libyan Airforce Facebook page – http://www.facebook.com/RyastArkanAlqwatAljwytAirForceLibyan) but discussions are ongoing about upgrades and new purchases. Most notable is a potential deal to purchase used Mirage 2000-9s from UAE.
Be great to hear you views.
“Still not only heavy (and costly) weapons are needed in
Mali…
That’s why Mirage F1CR have been operating with four Mk-82s.”
Why the Rafale’s or the Mirage’s 2000D don’t use Mk-82 too? They are able to use them (as far as I know), so it’s because they need mostly PGM. As it was the case in Libya. They are the professionals, so they know what’s better to use, don’t they?