Forget the F-22 and F-35, this is a real Super Maneuverable Fighter plane: the Russian Su-35 Flanker-E

Jun 17 2013 - 74 Comments

The Su-35 (NATO designation Flanker E), Russia’s latest version of the famous super-maneuverable multirole fighter jet has demonstrated its stunning capabilities during the first day of the 50th Paris Air Show at Le Bourget.

During its display, the 4++ generation aircraft has showcased some almost impossible manoeuvres, demonstrating unbelievable low-speed handling authority.

Su-35

Ok, it’s not stealth (even if some sources say it can detect stealth planes like the F-35 at a distance of over 90 kilometers), but once engaged in a WVR (Within Visual Range) air-to-air engagement, it can freely maneuver to point the nose and weapons in any direction, to achieve the proper position for a kill.

Some weeks ago, someone was impressed by a (quite normal) F-35’s High AOA test flight video.

Bill Flynn, Lockheed test pilot responsible for flight envelope expansion activities for the JSF recently said that all three variants of the Joint Strike Fighter will have better kinematic performance than any fourth-generation fighter plane with combat payload, including the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

The F-35 maneuverability shown in the video seems far to be special. Unlike the Su-35’s impressive one.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Ronnie Fairley

    I joined this web site for my love of aviation and by looking at this blog it seems no one knows about aircraft. The F-35 and F-22 are not the most maneuverable aircraft in the sky. You guys must never heard of the Su-35S or by its better designation SU-37 Terminator. The F-18 superhorney radar benchmark exceeds every other aircraft but guess what the are still firing araams which makes ther bvr equilant. dont let me start on the f-22 compared to the 35, 37 or even pak fa , let lleave it at this how many of you knew that the f22 internal bombay cant fire missiles when moving faster thatr the speed of sound

  • franciscoalmeida_br

    … mmm … do their “garbage machines” include these SU-35s?

    – and their rocket engines sold for Pentagon launches?
    – and their roadmobile highly maneuverable Mach21 Topol-M ICBMs?
    – and their Varshavyanka-class hyper-stealth nuclear submarines, dubbed by US as “black holes” as virtually undetectable?
    – and their hypersonic carrier-killer highly-maneuverable Club-K (Sizzler) missiles?
    – and the SS-N-12 Sandbox version of it? and its Yakohont version?
    – and the Mach-6 Brahmos II missiles they sold to India?
    – and also the Mach 10 DF-21D carrier-killer missile they sold to China?

    oh, I see what you mean …

  • Ted E. Bear

    I guess I would ask the pilots on deck which one they wanted to drive to the OK Corral gunfight.

  • Bambang Setyawan

    SU-35 Superterminator untuk Indonesia saya perlukan sebanyak 48 buah saja dimana akan saya bagi dalam tiga skuadron. Skuandron Rusmin Nuryadin, Skuadron Iswayudi dan Skuadron Ujungpandang. Pada saat ini setelah hilangnya “kewiraan” sebagai cara pandang bangsa Indonesia dalam masalah wilayah diperlukan “deterence” yang seimbang dengan para tetangga kita! Daripada uang kita diberikan untuk keperluan partai poltik yg tidak ada tujuan yg jelas mending dibelikan buat ini saja!

  • Coolerheads

    The Su-35 is faster and more maneuverable, but the whole point of the F-22 is stealth. The Su-35 has a longer radar range, and it’s radar can lock on an object with a radar signature of only 3 square meters. This is a very good improvement over previous radars. However, the F-22s radar signature is only 0.002 square meters. That means the Su-35 will never see the F-22 except at visual range. It doesn’t matter how fast or agile you are if you’re deaf and blind. In a real war, the F-22 will launch its missiles long before the Su-35 even knows it’s there. Even if the Su-35 sees the F-22 at visual range, it’s missiles will never be able to achieve a radar lock. That’s what Euro fighter pilots reported from joint exercises. Even when they could see the F-22 right in front of them with their own eyes, they couldn’t ever get a radar lock to fire their missiles. The F-22 doesn’t just reflect radar, its skin absorbs it. So even from above, below, beside, or when turning, a radar lock isn’t going to happen. The only down side of the F-22 is that it is crazy expensive to operate. The skin has to be re-applied for every flight and it costs a fortune. That’s why the US doesn’t use the F-22s very often. The per-flight cost is ridiculous. They will probably only ever see real sustained action if we get into a war with a highly sophisticated adversary, like Russia or China. Let’s hope that never happens for all our sakes.

  • bridgebuilder78

    You don’t ‘drive’ an airplane, you pilot the plane, Mr. Dumbass.