US military has launched 59 cruise missiles at airbase in Syria. Here’s what we know so far.

Apr 07 2017 - 40 Comments

Two U.S. destroyers cruising in the eastern Mediterranean Sea have fired 59 BGM-109 Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles at an airbase in western Syria. The cruise missiles flew across the Russian S-400 MEZ unscathed.

Last night, Alreigh Burke-class destroyers USS Porter (DDG-78) and USS Ross (DDG-71) launched cruise missiles into Syria, in response to the chemical weapons attack that killed dozens of civilians on Apr. 4.

On President Donald Trump’s order, 59 BGM-109 Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAMs) targeted runway, hardened aircraft shelters, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems, radars and fuel points at Shayrat Airbase, the airfield in western Syria from where, according to the intelligence gathered by the U.S., the aircraft that carried out the chemical attacks were launched

The track of the Syrian aircraft that carried out the CW attack on Khan Shaykhn (DoD released)

According to the first reports, all the aircraft based there have been destroyed or severely damaged, including some 30 Syrian Arab Air Force Su-22 Fitter attack planes, several SyAAF MiG-23s and also some Su-24 Fencers according to sources. For sure, considered the status of Assad’s air force, the attack may have had a significant impact on the ability of the loyalist air force to conduct air strikes.

However, later reports say that most of the aircraft based there were evacuated before the strike, and initial footage from Shayrat seems to show at least some areas of the airports, including taxiways, shelters, aprons, etc. with little or no damages.


Only 23 missiles flew to the Syrian air base and just 6 MiG-23s were destroyed there along with a radar station, spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Major-General Igor Konashenkov, said at a briefing. Where the remaining 36 cruise missiles have landed is “unknown,” he said.

According to Pentagon, the Russians were informed ahead of strike:

Russian forces were notified in advance of the strike using the established deconfliction line.  U.S. military planners took precautions to minimize risk to Russian or Syrian personnel located at the airfield.

Indeed, Shayrat Airbase is a Forward Operating Base for a few Russian Air Force Mi-35 and Ka-52 helicopters. The status of the choppers, provided some of these were there at the moment of the air strike, is unknown. However, considered that these are not mentioned in the Russian Defense Ministry statement it’s safe to assume they were not damaged by the TLAM attack.

Noteworthy, the TLAMs flew across the MEZ (Missile Engagement Zone) of the S-400 missile battery the Russians deployed to Latakia to protect the Russian air contingent deployed there in 2015.

Did Russia’s most advanced anti-aircraft defense system detect the missiles? For sure there are no reports of any of the BGM-109 intercepted by the S-400. 

Designated SA-21 “Growler” by NATO, the S-400 is believed to be able to engage all types of aerial targets including aircraft (someone says even VLO – Very Low Observable ones), drones and ballistic and cruise missiles within the range of 250 miles at an altitude of nearly 19 miles. Equipped with 3 different types of missiles and an acquisition radar capable of tracking up to 300 targets within the range of over 370 miles, the Triumph (or Triumf) is a system made of 8 launchers and a control station.

Supported by effective EW (Electronic Warfare) capabilities, the S-400 fires missiles against aerial targets flying at 17,000 km/h.

So, at least on paper, all non-stealth aircraft and missiles would hardly be able to dodge S-400 missiles. Assuming that the Russians probably detected at least some of the Tomahawks flying fast and low towards their targets at Shayrat Airbase it’s not clear why the Trimf did not attempt to intercept any of the TLAMs launched by the US destroyers, considered the reaction by Viktor Ozerov, head of the Russian Federation Council’s defense committee, who said the American attack was “an act of aggression against a UN member […] Cooperation between the Russian and US militaries may be shut down after the US strike.” according to state news agency RIA.

Perhaps, considered that they were informed beforehand, they simply decided to let them pass. The Russian MoD statement does not say mention any Russian air defense system intercepting any of the U.S. missiles launched towards Shayrat Airbase even though some sources have suggested only 23 missiles reached their targets because the other ones were brought down near Tartous by the local S-400 and S-300 batteries.

The S-400 MEZ (source: RT)


Anyway, the U.S. TLAM strike marks a shift in Washington’s posture regarding Syria and it represents the first direct action against Assad’s regime after six years of civil war.

Back in 2013, when a U.S. military operation in Syria was being rumored, we published an article that you can read here. Here are some key points of that story, that still apply four years later:

“Forget F-15E Strike Eagles and F/A-18E Super Hornets carrying PGMs (Precision Guided Munitions). Should Washington really get involved in Syria, it will probably be a limited air war, mainly made of cruise missiles, most (if not all) shot by warships or submarines and almost no involvement of “tacair” (tactical airplanes).


The attack would be conducted by the four destroyers in the Sixth fleet area of operations (USS Gravely, USS Barry, USS Mahan and USS Ramage) [in 2013 these were operating in the eastern Mediterranea], each theoretically capable to launch up to 90 Tomahawks Tactical Cruise Missiles (actually less, because these warships usually carry a mix of attack and air defense missiles).

High flying Global Hawk drones flying from Incirlik, Sigonella or Al Dhafra, will perform the post-strike BDA (Battle Damage Assessment). Some sorties will also be flown by U-2s.”

At that time a real air campaign was thought to be considered. The one carried out in the night between Apr. 6 and 7 was probably an isolated air strike in retaliation for the Syrian chemical strikes earlier this week.








  • ClarkKent

    ? boom!
    … goes the dynamite. ?


  • aurelien clave

    Sorry but the damage seem to be really low.

    • That’s why they always show the same couple of hangars to “prove” it ;)

    • FelixA9

      Call of Duty tends to overdo the ‘splosions.

  • Baudouin Jérusalem
  • oxi

    Another reckless illegal war!

    • Chris

      It was not Reckless it was not illegal and it certainly wasn’t a war.

  • su-34

    As usually, even without any investigation, the guilty party for the
    “chemical attack” was determined in no time… based on the declarations
    of the so called SOHR (a one man army financed by western governments),
    and the Oscar Price WH (surprise, also heavily financed by western governments). Of
    course, no bias at all… just mass media/politicians/other interested parties hysteria.
    When you hear Bibi & co. wailing for their beloved sunni neighbors, something must be really fishy!
    For a massive strike – actually big use of tax payer’s dollars (read corporate profits) – the effectiveness was quite limited. Most of the TLAMs didn’t even reach the intended target (some insidious voices suggest SAMs did down them), while the S400 doesn’t seem to have been used at all. The damage to the air base is quite low, and the damaged/destroyed planes were already scrap metal. But the media circus… makes it up for all the costs.

    PS: For such an esteemed site, which claims to specialize in aviation matters, to claim that the S400 complex’ missiles reach Mach 14 is a non excusable gaffe.

  • leroy

    “Perhaps, considered that they were informed beforehand, they simply decided to let them pass.”

    Or perhaps, like all Russian equipment, they are crap! That’s my guess. The “vaunted”, “mighty”, “all powerful”, “can’t touch this” S400 system. Not so capable as the Russians like to boast. But isn’t that what Russia is? All boast, no substance. It will be interesting to watch F-22 make a fool out of Moscow’s defense industries in the coming days and weeks. Seems the Russian Bear is only a cub.

    All missiles made it to their intended targets.

    • Pepe Le Cox

      And you said you are not a troll? you posted six messages in a row praising the powerful American military machinery and trampling the Russian!, come on!

    • Vladimir T

      You can try to fantasize as much as you like, but the whole world saw what kind of shit are American weapons. OMG, 23 out of 59 is absolut fail.

  • leroy

    A wonderful display of U.S. military might. A pathetic performance by Russian equipment, the Russian military, and the feeble Russian government. Time to prove to the world that Moscow is nothing but hot air. I know just the fighter that can do it!

    • OR

      I see a lot motivation in your posts.. please keep on good work;) What about that uss piece of metal that stack somewhere in Black Sea after su-24 with hibina flew over it?…

    • Ganga Prasad

      exactly. Out of 59 junks fired 36 were shot down

  • leroy

    Russia was given a 1 hour warning? I can just hear Russian forces screaming now; “Run Comrades Run! The Americans are coming. Grab your Stoli and blankets and get the hell outta here!” USAID will be happy to send Russian military forces stationed in Syria a few cases of very absorbent adult diapers.

  • Uniform223

    My thoughts…

    It could be that the other 36 Tomahawks were meant for ISIS targets. Also people are saying that the damage to the airbase appears to be minimal, it could be that the 23 missiles were armed with “low yield” warheads. If course there is always propaganda and conflicting reports like, “he said she said he said”…

  • Pepe Le Cox

    the new Judge Dredd at attack! the difference is that the new, judge and execute the sentence, but without previous investigation! Reminds me the Irak invasion in 2003, where all the intelligence agencies in USA, swore that Saddam had WMD, What happens in the Middle East, is the harvest of what they sowed with that illegal invasion in 2003.

  • Ilya Kurenkov

    And ISIS started attack on air base immediately after strike. Very. Good. Job. America.

  • rats123

    I have to ask one simple question. Why would Assad need to use chemical weapons? What does he achieve out of this except exactly what has happened here?

    • BernardP

      True : Basic question that nobody has been asking.

    • ratherdrive

      What was the benefit to Assad? Other than the continued support of Putin, exactly zero benefit.

  • leroy

    The Russians have called off deconfliction of aircraft. Good! We finally get to take the gloves off with Russia and hopefully shoot down one of their worthless fighters. Preferably an Su-35 but an Su-30 will do.

    Russia has been poking the U.S. and NATO in the eye way too much. Poking and allowed to get away with it. Threats with nukes, bombers infiltrating NATO airspace, U.S. warships being buzzed. Putin got away with it with President Obama, but he won’t with President Trump.

    Vladimir is long overdue for a good punch in the nose, and this lack of deconfliction will hopefully give our F-22s just the chance they’ve been looking for. Time to put Putin and Russia in their weak regional power box. Russia is all bombast, no substance. Let’s put Russia’s weak military on display for all the world to see. To see, and to laugh at! When it comes to capability, the Czar has no clothes,

    PS. Note the worthless Russian SAMs – both the S400 that supposedly protected the whole country and the useless system (SA-5 Gammon) that surrounded the airfield the U.S. so effortlessly took out. Still think Russia’s air defenses are unbeatable? Time for a few of you to wake up to reality! Russia is nothing but a paper bear, it’s “kit” useless against far superior Western and Israeli military systems. We prove it time and time again.

  • leroy

    This update just in: Even though the Russians were given 1 hr warning of the incoming attack, an attack coming in from the sea, the vaunted Russian S400 system didn’t engage a single U.S. Tomahawk. Not a single one! 60 launched, 59 hit their targets, 1 fell into the sea. ZERO were intercepted by Russian air defenses. ZERO!!!

    Russian RADARs were blank. They couldn’t see anything to engage. If that doesn’t say it all about the capability of Russian equipment, I don’t know what does. My God not even the Russia-made SAMs defending the Syrian aerodrome could stop these subsonic U.S. missiles. I really am astounded by the inept Russian air defense missile systems. NATO can obviously breathe a little bit easier. Kaliningrad will be just as ill-defended. Even Moscow!

    • Pepe Le Cox


    • Ganga Prasad

      out of 59 aimless shit fired only 23 hit pointless targets. You should be astounded by the waywardness of the most advanced cruise missiles of the US. Now Nato can breathe a little bit easier. Washington is better protected.

    • Pedro Gomez

      Oh my dear! Who told you that Russians had to shoot down those missiles? 59 tomahawks flew to the the agreed target – evacuated air-base.
      1) A few worthless planes were left.
      2) Runway stays undamaged.
      3) Next day Syrians fly again.
      4) Russians gain invaluable ($60 million for US taxpayers :))) experience of monitoring of the massive cruise missiles strike in hundred miles away from their air defense systems.
      5) Profit!

  • leroy

    The U.S. jammed the Russian S400 system. That’s why all of the Tomahawks got in. Don’t expect to hear anything about that from either the U.S. or Russia.

    • Sam Pensive

      In various stories about how to combat the S400 missiles reference is made to use of decoys and “active jammer’s” in the mix.. very well could be that some of the TLAM’s were not armed but sent along with the others to make detection difficult and confuse the ground defense radars.

  • franciwzm

    S-400 400km range missiles are not oeprative yet; ans -400 battery with full missiles reserve costs roughly 500 millions dollars; s-400 missiles are gigantic and therefore very easily intercepatbel themselves; for example IRIS_T is certified to intercept even smalla and agile wvr missiles; few days ago israel intercepted an s-200 missile launched vs an f16; crusie missiles travelling 10 meters above groun d are not interceptable by-s400 due to earth curvature; russian admitted s-400 are vey vulnerable to cruise missile and tried to develop pantsir as a response..Only way ans s-400 could detect and interceo very very very few cruise missiles is to put it on top of a very steep hill at least 50 meters high above surrounding terrain…Russian has a very few dozens of s-300 and s-400 because it cost 500 millions each an can cover just a 18 degrees radian: it is tought to work in a team of 6-7 to grant a defence area…A tomhawk is not best western crusie missile cosnidering precision and detonation power, but it has good range an it is quiote cheap compared for example to taurus-kepd…! year ago even sputnik news spoke about rafale using scalp missiles on Syria, because they know they ca be used even vs any s-400 …

    • Musescu_A

      18 degrees radian? What?!
      How do you know that they cost that much and how do you know that the system would be able to intercept a fast and low cruise missle only if it would be on top of a hill, at that altitude? How did you get to this conclusion? Seriously, these things are so complex you simply can’t say that.

      If you have a source for this I would be interested in seeing it. If you really do then I apologize because you might be right.

      • franciwzm

        It is pure phisics: earth surface is curve lol

    • Pepe Le Cox

      The S-300PMU1 cost is 300 mills, not 500 as you stated.

      Now the S-400 is this one:
      Unit cost $400 million per fire unit (division) that consists of 8 launchers, 112 missiles, command and support vehicles

  • mastercaveman

    I wonder if they launched 59 Tomahawks. Why show your hand like that to our enemy. Probably only 30.

  • ghostmourn

    The next time a tyrant thinks about using chemical weapons on children they will think twice.

  • Pedro Gomez
  • leroy

    Russia assured the world that S400 would protect all of Syria’s airspace. That turned out to be a promise as empty as the bottle of Stolichnaya Premium on the desk of the military incompetent Gen. Sergey Kuzhugetovich Shoygu. Any other boasts Sergey? Tell us again how Russian air defense systems protect all of the glorious Motherland? Or as with a former Luftwaffe General of infamous note should we simply go ahead and call you Comrade Meyer?