
Kalibr cruise missiles from submarine in the Med and bombs from Tu-22 Backfires have pounded targets in Syria.
On Dec. 8, Russia launched a barrage of new air and missile strikes against ground targets in Syria.
The attack was somehow spoiled by the NOTAM (Notice To Airmen) issued by the Iraq Civil Aviation Authority about the “possible missile movement throught he airspace of Northern Iraq” for 48 hours from 19.00 on Dec. 6, that forced airlines to cancel flights to Erbil, Iraq.
For the first time, a Russian Navy submarine took part in the strikes successfully hitting its designated target from the Mediterranean Sea: the improved Kilo-class Rostov-on-Don submarine launched the Kalibr-PL cruise missile a submarine-variant of the 3M14TE Kalibr-NK with a maximum range of 2,600 km, fired by a strike group consisting of the Dagestan missile ship, the small-sized missile ships Grad Sviyazhsk, Uglich, Veliky Ustyug early in the morning on Oct. 7 from the Caspian Sea.
The Rostov-on-Don (B-237) is a diesel-electric stealth sub, claimed to be one of the world’s quietest, the first example of the third generation submarines of the Varshavyanka class (Project 636) subs.
According to the Russian MoD, the cruise missiles targeted the “two major terrorist positions in the territory of Raqqa.”
Note: the submarine did not launch the missile from an underwater position.
Air strikes were also conducted by RuAF aircraft based at Latakia, and by some Tu-22M Backfire bombers from Mozdok airbase, in Ossetia, that performed 60 combat sorties in the last three days, dropping iron bombs on their targets.
Image credit: Russian Navy
I always wondered: is targeting pod footage quality purposely degraded or is it actually like that?
je constate une fois de plus que nos amis Russes font le ménage contre Daech, avec une riposte
imprèssionnante,il ont une force aérienne sans commune mesure!!!!
A kind reminder to the war hawks encroaching Russia:
“We must analyze everything happening on the battlefield, how the
weapons operate. The Kalibrs (sea based cruise missiles) and KH-101
(airborne cruise missile) have proved to be modern and highly effective,
and now we know it for sure – precision weapons that can be equipped
with both conventional and special warheads, which are nuclear,” Putin said.
“Naturally, this is not necessary when fighting terrorists and, I hope, will never be needed,” the president added.
the real question is how many ‘takes’ did it take before they had footage without one of the missiles blowing up or veering off course into the ocean after launch?
diesel electric submarine are not stealth and easily spotted by nato : only stealth submarines are fuel cell ones, and secondly the nuclear powered western ones.: a submarine that is not stealth is not useful in a real war scenario vs advanced systems, that is why russia have no submarines vs a possible nato confrontation.
Oh yeah, that’s why Gotland class DIESEL subs have been getting at US CVG’s every time they’ve been mock fighting? Because AIP… You guys are funny, all bull, no brain.
Stealth submarines? That’s an idea…Maybe you should check what kind of Sub swatted the HMS Illustrious in 2007. It was an antiquated SSK design from the 70’s. Bu
What about the Russian “Black Hole” submarines?
Please explain yourself : a diesel is very quiet for a limited time and range, quieter than a nuclear one due to lack of pumps.
Obviously a diesel cannot hunt a CAG in the open ocean, but defend a choke point, I’d say so.
Only fuel cells ones are stealthy; western nuclear powered ones are very well insulated anyway
Running on batteries is very quiet, so I will take it that you mean in an operational sense with the need to snorkle.
All recent exercises with nuclear vs electric on average end up with the electric as winner, see for example the Gotland exercises outside San Diego.
Fuel cells means very long autonomy electric powered sub: you cant go to war with diesel electric powered ones.
Yes you can, but you are operationally limited. In a archipelago setting it works just fine, in open ocean not so.
Wrong again.
D-E subs run on BATTERIES when silent.
That was true also in ww2.
Actually, a D-E sub CAN hunt in the open ocean.
In 2007 HMCS Corner Brook stalked HMS Illustrious.
http://www.wired.com/2007/08/gotcha-canuck-s/
Incorrect.
If D-E’s are useless, then why has the USN been using them for training, under the DESI program for YEARS?
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/48120/us-ratifies-cape-town-aircraft-protocol-(nov.-3).html
http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/underseawarfaremagazine/Issues/Archives/issue_38/desi.html
D-E’s are quieter than nuke subs.
They’re not “quieter”, they’re different. Apples and oranges. You don’t need a bazooka everytime, but you need a bazooka from time to time. Hence why you have Diesels and SSBN’s.
Yes, they are quieter.
Nukes need pumps to keep the coolant circulating in the reactor.
It’s cool you went to Wiki to check that out, but there’s more to it especially when it comes to detect and be detected. But whatever.