Japan Considering Naming its GCAP Fighter After the WW2-Era A7M ‘Reppu’: Reports

Published on: May 3, 2025 at 6:11 PM
An artist’s render featuring the future GCAP flying over Tokyo. (Image credit: Leonardo) Inset: A Mitsubishi A7M2 Reppū. (Image credit: U.S. National Archives/U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News)

The A7M Reppu (Strong Gale) was conceived to succeed the legendary A6M Zero, but it never flew.

Reports from Japan, quoting defense officials in deep background, have said the country’s MoD (Ministry of Defense) is considering designating its sixth-generation fighter being developed under the collaborative GCAP (Global Combat Air Program) as “Reppu” (Strong Wind/Gale), after a World War II Imperial Japanese Navy fighter. A Kyodo exclusive story, relying on “interviews with multiple government officials,” said the “consideration is carried out in secret” by the MoD leadership.

The A7M Reppu was a cancelled project, conceived as a successor to the legendary A6M Zero series of naval fighters. Few prototypes were produced and some of them destroyed in American air raids, with the general industrial destruction of Japan ensuring the aircraft never saw service. Jeffrey J. Hall, a lecturer at Kanda University of International Studies, said on X that the new jet could be called the ‘F-3 Reppu’.

The development is also triggering criticism as it seeks to “evoke militarism”, since Tokyo’s Constitution curtailed arms buildups in a bid to steer away from its controversial legacy of the Second World War. While the JASDF has an established nomenclature, like “F” denoting fighter and “C” denoting cargo aircraft, and “no [existing] rules” govern the naming of aircraft making it the prerogative of the government, the plan nevertheless stirs a political minefield.

For instance, the JMSDF’s Soryu submarine, the lead vessel of the class, shares its name with the IJN (Imperial Japanese Navy) carrier Soryu. That ship sank along with three other IJN carriers in June 1942 during the Battle of Midway, after being struck by dive bombers from the USS Yorktown. It is not clear if Japan would rely on this precedent and, so far, no official announcement has been made.

A Mitsubishi A7M2 Reppū (“Strong Gale”) in a hangar of the Yokosuka Naval Air Technical Arsenal, after the end of the Second World War, circa in late 1945. (Image credit: U.S. National Archives/U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News)

GCAP program

The sixth-generation jet was originally a British-Italian-Swedish collaboration and, following Stockholm’s unofficial exit, transitioned into a British-Japanese cooperation in Dec. 2021 to develop engine and radar prototypes for their Tempest and F-X fighter projects, respectively. Japan was originally working on the domestic Mitsubishi F-X program.

A subsequent announcement in Dec. 2022 unveiled the current Global Combat Air Program (GCAP) which involves London, Rome, and Tokyo. The new fighter is expected to replace the Eurofighters in the United Kingdom and Italy and the F-2s (Japanese derivative of the F-16) in Japan from 2035 onwards.

The program marks a diplomatic first where Japan directly works with Italy and the United Kingdom on an equal financial, industrial and political footing, with equal operational and technological access – a novelty for all three nations after the F-35 program. The three have established trilateral joint bodies with rotating leaderships to oversee the program and synergize the diplomatic, scientific and military functions.

GCAP model with the Japanese roundels. (Image credit: Leonardo)

In Dec. 2023, the GCAP International Government Organisation (GIGO) treaty was established, consisting of a Steering Committee (SC) and the GCAP Agency. The SC provides oversight and strategic direction, while the GCAP Agency, headquartered in Reading, UK, coordinates industrial activities and oversees regulatory compliance. The GCAP Agency‘s co-location with the Joint Venture (JV) made up by British, Italian and Japanese companies, established in December 2024, is expected to synergize the political and industrial dynamics.

IMAGE 3: Concept rendition of a GCAP jet. (Image credit: BAE Systems)

A7M Reppu

The A7M Reppu was meant to succeed the legendary Mitsubishi A6M “Reisen” (Zero) series of fighters that flew off Japanese carriers. Known for their immense range, turn rate, climb rate, unparalleled maneuverability as dogfighters and heavy armament, they were beset with poor armor. The Zero had variants from A6M2 to the A6M8, with differing engines and armaments.

The A7M1 developed by Mitsubishi first flew on May 6, 1944 but, while displaying good maneuverability, IJN planners were dissatisfied with the poor output from the Nakajima Homare 22 engine, according to Military Factory. Mitsubishi then flew an improved A7M2 powered by a Ha-43 engine with a 2,200 hp engine, and the aircraft reportedly touched a top speed of 628 km/h.

However, factors like an earthquake in Nagoya destroying the factory, the loss of trained crew, experienced pilots and the general destruction of Japanese industry stymied the A7M Reppu program. Combined with improved Allied tactics and better aircraft like the P-40 Warhawk, P-38 Lightning, P-47 Thunderbolt, P-51 Mustang, the carrier-borne F-4U Corsair and high-flying B-29 Superfortress strategic bombers, undid the Japanese air advantage in general, and killed the A7M project in particular.

An A7M2 Reppu in a Japanese hangar after the end of World War Two in late-1945. (Image credit: Wikimedia Commons via US National Archives/US Navy Naval Aviation News)

Military Factory added that three more A7Ms were lost to U.S. bombings and the Japanese surrender on Aug. 15, 1945, officially ended the project. The A7M would therefore never see combat. A June 1947 United States Bombing Survey Aircraft Division (USBS) report we found here mentions Mitsubishi produced two A7M1 prototypes and seven A7M2 prototypes, for a total of nine aircraft.

A Reppu captured in an official image at Yokosuka Naval Air Technical Arsenal  in late 1945, after the end of WW2, and available on the Navy History and Heritage and Command website is identified as an A7M2 on Wikimedia Commons. The NHHC meanwhile says it is an A7M3. The aircraft bears the tail marking J-A7-3.

Challenges

The GCAP program would nevertheless face its share of challenges and needs to avoid the mistakes from the Eurofighter Typhoon project, according to the UK’s House of Commons committee’s report on the project, as reported by The Aviationist. This primarily includes balancing the complex equations of dynamic diplomatic relations between the partner countries, international industrial partnerships, trade and expectations of workshare agreements for timely deliveries and avoid cost overruns. This extends to ensuring that entry of new partner nations in the program does not overshoot the “crucial 2035 target date.”

Secondly, the British parliamentary report also advised to select partner nations not only on their funding ability, but also techno-industrial capability, without altering the timeline. This is while also ensuring the exportability of the platform and avoiding disputes over foreign sales, as was witnessed over the Eurofighter Typhoon program. Securing foreign sales has a broader economic imperative, lack of which hurts production lines, making “recruitment and retention” of the workforce “a major challenge.”

GCAP Joint Venture
An artist’s render featuring the future GCAP flying over Tokyo. (Image credit: Leonardo)

The British Parliament also notes the impact of Japan and its evolving domestic political scene over military buildups on the sticky issue of export. While foreign sales of the GCAP could possibly be hampered by Tokyo’s “cultural antimilitarism” rooted in the aftermath of the Second World War, the report also acknowledges the changing Japanese public opinion and defense posture, making it important to continue supporting Japan’s participation in the GCAP.

Additionally, the committee noted “great confidence in the commitment and capabilities” of Japan and Italy, and that it was “impressed by the depth of the Japanese offer and the technical progress they have made so far.” Italy’s Institute for International Affairs (Istituto Affari Internazionali) also recommended a set of measures for the smooth political, industrial and technological execution of the project in a Mar. 2025 study.

Share This Article
Follow:
Parth Satam's career spans a decade and a half between two dailies and two defense publications. He believes war, as a human activity, has causes and results that go far beyond which missile and jet flies the fastest. He therefore loves analyzing military affairs at their intersection with foreign policy, economics, technology, society and history. The body of his work spans the entire breadth from defense aerospace, tactics, military doctrine and theory, personnel issues, West Asian, Eurasian affairs, the energy sector and Space.
Leave a comment