From Ukraine to Israel: The Crucial Role of Helicopters in Stopping Drones

Helicopters vs drones
Mi-8MT helicopter of the Ukrainian military. (Image credit: SC Ukroboronprom)

Helicopters Prove Vital in Air-to-Air Combat Against Drones.

On Aug. 25, 2024 some videos showing Ukrainian soldiers shooting down Russian drones from a Mi-8 transport helicopter were shared on X (formerly Twitter).

In the first video coming from Ukraine, a crewman can be seen manning the door-mounted machine gun while the helicopter flies alongside a Shahed Russian drone, before letting out a short burst that impacts the drone sending pieces of it flying away. However the smoking kamikaze drone keeps flying and the crewman has to unleash another two short burst to finally send it crashing to the ground.

In another video, this time filmed from the cockpit of a Mi-8, the helicopter is seen pursuing an enemy drone, and the crewman operating the frontal machine guns unleashes some burst of fire aimed at the not-clearly visible target.

After some firing, a smoke trail can be briefly seen before a fireball suddenly appears in front of the helicopter, signalling the explosion of the drone being hit by bullets.

Another video, dated Aug. 26, 2024, shows a Mi-24 attack helicopter trying to hit a Shahed drone with its onboard cannon, but the video, shot from the ground, cuts only after a few short bursts, with the helicopter still chasing the drone.

Ukrainian Mi-24 tries to shoot down Russian Shaheed suicide drone in Kyiv Oblast, 26th of Aug 2024
byu/BlackMarine inCombatFootage

More or less in the same hours, the Israeli Air Force published on X some footage of the strike operation in Lebanon against Hezbollah’s rocket launchers and drones, including a video of an Apache helicopter shooting down what appears as an Iranian V-tailed Samad UAV using the onboard 30mm cannon.

Helicopters vs drones

The Mil Mi-8 is a Soviet-era medium twin-turbine helicopter, usually used for transport or in some instances to lob rockets at enemy forces, but using it as an air-to-air platform against drones is a innovation brought by the emergence of slow-moving threats in the form of kamikaze drones.

Ukraine has also been using Yak-52 trainer aircraft to shoot down enemy drones using tactics reminiscent of the WWI or WWII air-to-air dogfights, and we recently reported about Russia modernizing its Yak-52 trainers and converting them to shoot at Ukrainian drones. In fact, the use of faster-moving jets against slow-moving drones can pose many issues, from the drones moving too slowly to safely intercept before stalling, to the threat of the exploding drones for the intercepting plane, as shown by Ukrainian pilot Vadym Voroshylov , callsign “Karaya”, having to eject from his stricken Mig-29 fighter jet after impacting debris of the targeted drone.

Earlier this year, we have also reported in details about the extensive use by the Russian Navy of helicopters to intercept the Ukrainian USV (Unmanned Surface Vehicles) around Crimea. Ukrainian “drone boats” or “drone vessels,” outfitted with sophisticated technologies, allowing them to conduct a range of missions, such as reconnaissance, surveillance, and notably, offensive strikes against Russian Navy ships, have been a formidable threat to Russian naval forces in the Black Sea. And, like their flying counterparts, USVs (Unmanned Surface Vehicles) are difficult to detect and intercept.

Israel has also used its gunship helicopters to intercept kamikaze drones recently.

Intercepting a slow mover

Interestingly, similar difficulties were faced by American pilots over 70 years ago in Korea, when the task of shooting down slow Polikarpov Po-2 biplanes proved quite difficult, even prompting the use of AD-4 Skyraiders as air-to-air aircraft, and seeing an F-94 jet fighter crashing after slowing below its stall speed.

Later during the Vietnam war, an unarmed American UH-1 Huey transport helicopter flown by Capt. Ted Moore also intercepted a fleeing North Vietnamese An-2 biplane, converted to an improvised bomber, and crewman Glenn Woods shot it down using an AK-47.

More recently, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the somewhat frequent enforcement of NFZs (No Fly Zones) to defend sensitive targets and events from renegade and asymmetric threats, combat helicopters equipped with handheld/side mounted machine guns have often been included in multi-layer air defense packages in the SMI (Slow Mover Intercept) role, with the task to intercept small private planes, helicopters, lightweight aircraft and, of course, drones.

Using helicopters to intercept slow-moving drones makes sense and it can be more effective and cost-efficient than deploying fighter jets with expensive air-to-air missiles. For several reasons:

  • Helicopters are far cheaper to operate than fighter jets. The operational costs of fuel, maintenance, and crew support for helicopters are significantly lower than for high-performance fighter jets. Additionally, helicopters often use less expensive ammunition, such as machine guns or cannons, rather than costly air-to-air missiles, making each interception far more economical.
  • Helicopters offer a significant operational flexibility: unlike fighter jets, they don’t need a runway, as they can operate from improvised airfields and forward operating bases.
  • Helicopters can fly at lower speeds and altitudes, making them better suited for engaging slow-moving drones. High performance interceptors, designed for high-speed targets, may struggle to operate at the slow speeds necessary for identifying and engaging drones.
  • Helicopters are designed to operate at low altitude: they are optimized for slow speed, low altitude, long endurance missions and are more efficient in combat air patrols against drones in case of point defense. On the other end, fast moving fighter jets can quickly cover the distance required to intercept a drone whereas a helicopter may struggle to close on its target over longer distances.

One last comment

As a side note, another video widely circulated online is said to show the shooting down of a Russian cruise missile using only a .50 cal M2 heavy machine gun.

The Transcarpathian 650th separate anti-aircraft machine gun battalion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, shoot down a cruise missile with a heavy machinegun.
byu/Smart-Bonus-6589 inCombatFootage

However, considering the speed of the target and the moment the gunner starts firing, it seems quite unreasonable to affirm the missile was downed by the the machine gun. Provided the clip is not doctored, the cruise missile was most probably shot down by something else, possibly a SAM (Surface to Air Missile).

About David Cenciotti
David Cenciotti is a journalist based in Rome, Italy. He is the Founder and Editor of “The Aviationist”, one of the world’s most famous and read military aviation blogs. Since 1996, he has written for major worldwide magazines, including Air Forces Monthly, Combat Aircraft, and many others, covering aviation, defense, war, industry, intelligence, crime and cyberwar. He has reported from the U.S., Europe, Australia and Syria, and flown several combat planes with different air forces. He is a former 2nd Lt. of the Italian Air Force, a private pilot and a graduate in Computer Engineering. He has written five books and contributed to many more ones.
About Andrea Daolio
Andrea Daolio is an aviation expert from Italy. He has a mechanical engineering background and, alongside his great interest for aviation, also has a longstanding passion for wargaming and for geopolitics, international relationsHope, history, space, military technology and military history.