Thunderbirds rehearsing for Jesolo Air Extreme 2011: Prandtl-Glauert Singularity and condensation clouds on display

On Jun. 10, 2011, I attended the Thunderbirds’s rehearsal at Jesolo for the Air Extreme 2011 airshow. Pictures I’ve taken show plenty of condesation clouds being generated by the USAF demo team’s F-16s. Even spectators usually think that such clouds surrounding the aircraft represent a visual manifestation of a “sonic boom”, they are the effect of the quick depression on the flight surfaces that brings the water vapour contained in the air at the condensation temperature.

It is a common phenomenon in high-G maneuvers, when the depression on the upper side of the wing increases (as the lift does); it can be observed even at sea level, when the amount of moisture is significant and air temperature is quite hot.

Something quite different are the conic-shape clouds that are generated around aircraft flying at speeds next to the sound’s speed (they are not particularly evident in the pictures taken at Jesolo, though, but you can find many examples here). They are not visual effects of the so called “sonic booms”: more simply, when an aircraft flies at transonic speeds (around Mach 1.0), any of its convess parts (canopy, intakes, etc.) causes a rapid decrease of temperature and pressure with subsequent creation of the cloud.

The variation in temperature caused by the perturbation of the airflows is called Prandtl-Glauert Singularity. The particular shape of the cloud associated to the singularity is caused by the perturbation: at that point the airflow can reach supersonic speed and generate a shock wave (that appears when the fluid decelerates and the temperature suddenly raises).

Salva

About David Cenciotti
David Cenciotti is a freelance journalist based in Rome, Italy. He is the Founder and Editor of “The Aviationist”, one of the world’s most famous and read military aviation blogs. Since 1996, he has written for major worldwide magazines, including Air Forces Monthly, Combat Aircraft, and many others, covering aviation, defense, war, industry, intelligence, crime and cyberwar. He has reported from the U.S., Europe, Australia and Syria, and flown several combat planes with different air forces. He is a former 2nd Lt. of the Italian Air Force, a private pilot and a graduate in Computer Engineering. He has written five books and contributed to many more ones.

1 Comment

  1. I hope you have learned why the aircraft fly, David!

    You can forget all you learned about Bernoulli and longer airflow path over wing!

    All flights take place due to airspeed and Angle of Attack (AOA)!

    UsAirForce Museeum in Dayton Ohio still show the false Lift Explantion with Bernoulli and “longer aiflow path over wing”!

    I ask them once ,how an F-16 could fly inverted, and they anwered that then the aircraft used “more AOA” to keep flying!

    They should however not change there “false” Bernoulli explanation, until Smithsonian Museeum changed their Liftexplantion!

    http://www.nasm.si.edu/education/pubs/howthingsfly.pdf

    But NASA Glenn Reseach knows better:

    http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/bernnew.html

    http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/lift1.html

    I once sent NASA Glenn this “downwash grave ” picture:

    http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/downwash.html

    Have you seen the wing of the new B747-8 with flat upperside?

    http://www.malaysianwings.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=15600&st=40

    Using Navier-Stokes calculation, AOA is simple to be shown, but in potential theory calculation you don´t se AOA.

    Best Regards

    Jan-Olov Newborg

Comments are closed.