A Second Pilot Was Killed Last Week, The Air Force Isn’t Saying Which Type (Then Says “Definitely not an F-35”). He Was An F-35 Pilot.
Following the release of information about two A-10C Thunderbolt II attack aircraft crashing over the Nevada Test and Training Range near Nellis AFB outside Las Vegas last Wednesday (after an F-16 from 162FW had crashed killing an Iraqi student pilot) there are media reports of an additional, third aircraft that also crashed, but the aircraft type and mission have not been released. Reports indicate this third crash reported happened on Tuesday, September 5, the day before the two A-10s crashed.
Reports of this earlier, third crash from this week began surfacing in local Nevada media late on Friday, September 8, two days after the reports of the two A-10s crashing.
Reports do not indicate the type aircraft that pilot Lt. Col. Eric Schultz was flying, but a short story published on the Capital Gazette by writer Rick Hutzell said, “The aircraft was assigned to Air Force Materiel Command, which leads development of new combat technologies for the service.”
The stated mission of the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) is, “To conduct research, development, testing and evaluation, and provide acquisition and life cycle management services and logistics support.” This mission set is congruent with new aircraft development.
USAF Major Christina Sukach, a spokeswoman for the 99th Air Base Wing, was reported as telling media that, “Lt. Col. Schultz died as a result of injuries sustained in the accident. The crash remains under investigation, and additional details were not immediately available.”
“These are separate incidents and both are currently under investigation to determine their causes,” Nellis Public Affairs told Oriana Pawlyk and Brendan McGarry, reporters for Military.com.
“Information about the type of aircraft involved is classified and not releasable,” Maj. Christina Sukach, chief of public affairs for the 99 Air Base Wing at Nellis, said in an email to Military.com.
Reports also suggest that Lt. Col. Schultz may have initially survived the mishap, and died from injuries sustained in the classified crash.
While there is no official information reporting what aircraft Lt. Col. Schultz was flying at the time of Tuesday’s crash, the only available photos of Lt. Col. Schultz show him in the cockpit of an F-35A (needless to say, meanwhile he may have moved to another program..)
According to sources, Capt. Eric Schultz became the 28th pilot to fly the F-35 when he took off from Edwards AFB, California, in F-35A AF-1 for a 1.3-hour test mission on September 15, 2011.
Additionally, the AFMC, to which the crashed aircraft belonged, is a parent unit of the 412th Test Wing, based at Edwards Air Force Base, whose 416 FLTS (Flight Test Squadron) flies the F-35 Lightning II.
For these reasons, there are growing speculations that the aircraft involved in the crash is an F-35 working inside the Nellis Test and Training Range. Still, the aircraft could also be some Black Project jet that the U.S. Air Force wants to remain secret for some more time.
An official Air Force media release on the Mountain Home AFB website from September 28, 2006 said, “As a young boy, Capt. Eric Schultz, dreamed of being an astronaut. As a young man, he couldn’t become a military pilot because of his poor eyesight. For 10 years, during which the military denied him entrance three times, he did the next best thing: earning a doctorate in aerospace engineering. But his dream of flight took off again when Schultz underwent laser eye surgery and the Air Force accepted him as a pilot.”
We will update the story as soon as new details emerge.
Update on Sept. 9, 15.14 UTC:
Looks like the F-35 theory has been debunked:
#BREAKING: “I can definitely say it was not an F-35,” –@GenDaveGoldfein told @Militarydotcom accompanying him on trip to #NGAUS2017. https://t.co/5IlGYUqFdA
— Oriana Pawlyk (@Oriana0214) September 9, 2017
Actually the rumours are that it was a B-21 prototype. If it was a plain F-35 they wouldn’t have been this secretive.
B21 is so early along it’s unlikely it’s flyable, and if it is it would be a company pilot.
Is this sarcasm? Can’t tell: “Update on Sept. 9, 15.14 UTC: Looks like the F-35 theory has been debunked”
Some of the comments I have read (not just here) surrounding this unfortunate incident is sickening to me. The critics and detractors (often Sukhoi/Mig fanboy base it would seem…) are already using this as “ammo” for their cause. Rather than mourn the unfortunate passing of someone greater then most of us, people are using his affiliation with a very scrutinized aircraft/program in a sad and weak attempt to make something up.
You’re not wrong, but welcome to the internet. You can refer to any of leroy’s posts for counter sukhoi/mig fanboy theme.
Russians say that the aircraft in question was their SU-27 obtained through a third party to imitate “an enemy” in training. Could it be true?