[Updated] Iranian Attack on Prince Sultan Air Base Reportedly Struck U.S. KC-135s, E-3 Sentry

Published on: March 27, 2026 at 11:25 PM
File photo of a KC-135 Stratotanker after landing at Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (Image credit: U.S. Air Force photo by Capt. Tisha Yates)

Satellite images show signs of an attack at Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia, with The Wall Street Journal now reporting that an Iranian missile damaged “several U.S. refueling aircraft.”

Satellite images emerged on Mar. 27, 2026, appeared to show signs of damage on an apron used by U.S. aircraft at Prince Sultan Air Base, in Saudi Arabia. The images were initially thought to be linked to an attack which damaged KC-135 Stratotankers aerial refueling aircraft two weeks earlier.

However, the European satellite Sentinel-2, using Short-Wave Infra-Red (SWIR) imagery, showed a heat signature at the same location on Mar. 27. The heat signature might have been possibly caused by flames and the hot gases in the smoke towering from the area.

Now, The Wall Street Journal, quoting U.S. and Saudi officials familiar with the matter, reports that Prince Sultan Air Base was hit by an Iranian missile, “damaging several U.S. refueling aircraft.” The unnamed officials also noted the use of drones in the strike.

The damage is currently unclear. Although previous satellite photos showed multiple tankers stacked closely in the open on the same apron, the images available are in low-resolution and do not allow to visually confirm the presence and amount of damage to airframes.

According to an article published by Air&Space Forces, an E-3 Sentry AWACS plane was also damaged, although the report could not be verified.

The U.S. Central Command has not yet commented on the matter. U.S. media outlets are reporting 10-12 U.S. service members were injured in the attack.

Previous attack

Earlier in the month, The Wall Street Journal, quoting U.S. officials, reported that five U.S. Air Force refueling planes on the ground at Prince Sultan Air Base were damaged in an Iranian missile strike. The publication mentioned at the time that the aircraft were already being repaired and none was destroyed.

U.S. President Donald Trump disputed the reports, saying that “four of the five had virtually no damage,” while “one had slightly more damage.” At the time, a statement from CENTCOM was not available.

The type of aerial refuelers damaged in the Iranian attack was disclosed. However, satellite imagery showed only KC-135s deployed at the base, although we can’t rule out some KC-46s were also there due to the delay between the acquisition and the publication of the images.

Prince Sultan Air Base

Prince Sultan Air Base is a strategic forward operating base that is located in the Saudi interior some 600 km from the Iranian coast. Because of its strategic position, the base regularly hosts U.S. assets, such as tankers, AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) and SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) aircraft.

Due to the U.S. presence, the base has been targeted by Iranian air strikes multiple times recently. The attacks also caused the death of U.S. service members deployed there.

Attacks on parked aircraft

The series of attacks on Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States has already damaged or destroyed several U.S. and allied aircraft. The question is whether the Pentagon underestimated the lessons of Ukrainian war and, in particular, the operation that last year destroyed a significant portion of Russia’s strategic aviation. Certainly, the war in Ukraine and the emerging threat posed by various kinds of drones, including FPV (First Person View) ones, have made dispersal and the sheltered recovery of the most critical assets a renewed priority for all air arms, marking a return to the Cold War doctrine that called for the use of HAS (Hardened Aircraft Shelters) for tactical jets dispersed across airbases. Obviously, such shelters are not suitable for large aircraft like tankers, transport aircraft, or strategic bombers, which for this reason need to be based beyond the reach of Iranian missiles or drones. In this case, U.S. planners must have assumed they could still keep aircraft parked in the open, even though the previous attacks should have served as a significant warning.

This is a developing story, we will update it as soon as new details emerge.

Share This Article
Follow:
Stefano D'Urso is the Deputy Editor at The Aviationist, based in Lecce, Italy. He holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Engineering and is currently pursuing a Master’s Degree in Aerospace Engineering. His areas of expertise include emerging aerospace and defense technologies, electronic warfare, unmanned and autonomous systems, loitering munitions, and the application of OSINT techniques to the analysis of military operations and contemporary conflicts.
Follow:
David Cenciotti is a journalist based in Rome, Italy. He is the Founder and Editor of “The Aviationist”, one of the world’s most famous and read military aviation blogs. Since 1996, he has written for major worldwide magazines, including Air Forces Monthly, Combat Aircraft, and many others, covering aviation, defense, war, industry, intelligence, crime and cyberwar. He has reported from the U.S., Europe, Australia and Syria, and flown several combat planes with different air forces. He is a former 2nd Lt. of the Italian Air Force, a private pilot and a graduate in Computer Engineering. He has written five books and contributed to many more ones.
Leave a comment