Shopping for Fighters: Is the Chinese/Pakistani JF-17 Thunder the Real “Joint Strike Fighter”?

Cheap, Easy, Available: Asia’s JF-17 Thunder Contrasts U.S. and Russian Tactical Aircraft.

Develop it faster, build it cheaper and make it more available. From electronics to automobiles, the Asian doctrine of the 20th century. With the rush toward globalization and the blurring of borders in the internet age, manufactured products in every category move across borders and subvert political boundaries with impunity.

Tactical combat aircraft may be the next category.

Traditionally, high level defense and aerospace programs have been slow to move toward global distribution largely because of regional security concerns, partially because of technology concerns, and definitely because of economic concerns. But those concerns may be taking a back seat to the new priorities of updating old air forces as new political boundaries and alliances are drawn, and old ones are erased.

Enter the Chinese and Pakistani co-manufactured PAC JF-17 Thunder tactical aircraft, also referred to as the CAC FC-1 Xiaolong or “Fierce Dragon”. The JF-17 is a lightweight, single-engine, multi-role combat aircraft developed from a joint venture between the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) and the Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) of China.

In the ethos of eastern imports competing with western aircraft like the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter program, the JF-17 Thunder can be hawked as “better, cheaper, faster” to many end users who could not afford to participate in the U.S. Joint Strike Fighter program for political or financial reasons or both. While the “better” and “faster” are certainly doubtful, the “cheaper” is set in stone. For many countries, that is the single most important acquisition metric; affordability.

Global political change has mandated the need for new mass-market, non-western import/export multi-role tactical aircraft. When the former Soviet Warsaw Pact defense industry collapsed along with the Iron Curtain at the end of the Cold War it left huge inventories of largely Russian-built tactical aircraft in service with third world air forces.

The Russian-built MiGs and Sukhois in African and Arab service were sturdy, easy to maintain and designed to operate in austere conditions. They were perfect for air forces in developing nations. When countries engaged in a greater or lesser degree of political alignment with the former Soviet Union, the price of the Russian-built tactical aircraft went down, sometimes to zero in lend-lease or other political machinations.

But those old Eastern Bloc, Cold War Russian planes supplied to banana republic countries and oil nations with shifting global agendas are wearing out, and many of the lines that separated the countries who use them have been erased and redrawn in the Arab Spring and the new Africa. These changes have created a market for a new, affordable, regionally capable fighter plane. The Chinese and Pakistani JF-17 may fill that need.

The JF-17 many fill a low-cost, more available niche for many nations (Photo: PAC/CAC)

The generic looking, “no-brand” JF-17 is what most people would sketch on a napkin to show what jet fighters look like. It is quite unremarkable by 5th generation combat aircraft standards. If U.S. wholesale retailers Costco or Sam’s Club sold fighter planes, they would sell the JF-17. The JF-17 probably may have more in common with the 1950’s F-100 Super Saber than the current F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

In numbers, a JF-17 Thunder costs (approximately) between $25 million USD-$32 million USD, depending on the tranche and avionics version. Contrast that with the $94 million to $134 million USD price tag of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. If you are a sales agent for the Chinese/Pakistan consortium building the JF-17 one of the first lines in your pitch at the Paris or Dubai Air Show will be, “For the price of one F-35 you can fly almost four JF-17s!” Then you open your slick PowerPoint (in one of 6 languages) and back up your sales pitch with shorter training cycles for air crew, lower maintenance cost, easier and faster acquisition, and on and on.

New upgrade proposals and capability expansion for the JF-17 program make a versatile and affordable option. (Photo: PAC/CAC)

If you are selling the JF-17 Thunder it is unlikely you will be courting the same prospective market as F-35 program participants. And you will certainly do well to also stay away from comparisons about capability, because comparing an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in any version to the JF-17 Thunder is like comparing a Bomar Brain pocket calculator from the 1970’s to a new MacBook Pro computer. They are completely different products.

But the JF-17 is still a capable aircraft that is well-engineered for a burgeoning market of basic tactical aircraft consumer nations. To date, operators include Myanmar, Nigeria and Pakistan. Countries that have indicated, at some point, an interest in the project include Argentina, Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Qatar, Iran, Lebanon, Malaysia, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka and Uruguay.

Given the dynamic nature of global politics and fluid changes in alliances the JF-17 fills a niche for many countries. That alone is reason to be familiar with it.

Top image credit: Shimin Gu




About Tom Demerly
Tom Demerly is a feature writer, journalist, photographer and editorialist who has written articles that are published around the world on,, Outside magazine, Business Insider, We Are The Mighty, The Dearborn Press & Guide, National Interest, Russia’s government media outlet Sputnik, and many other publications. Demerly studied journalism at Henry Ford College in Dearborn, Michigan. Tom Demerly served in an intelligence gathering unit as a member of the U.S. Army and Michigan National Guard. His military experience includes being Honor Graduate from the U.S. Army Infantry School at Ft. Benning, Georgia (Cycle C-6-1) and as a Scout Observer in a reconnaissance unit, Company “F”, 425th INF (RANGER/AIRBORNE), Long Range Surveillance Unit (LRSU). Demerly is an experienced parachutist, holds advanced SCUBA certifications, has climbed the highest mountains on three continents and visited all seven continents and has flown several types of light aircraft.


  1. Excellent article…..JF 17 is going to be the choice of all nations that have flown Mig 21 or Mirages…..period.

  2. Hi Leory

    Just to clarify your comment there are no exact agreed upon casualties for the Vietnam war. Instead there basically three estimates, low (1.45m), middle (2.45m) and high (3.59m).

    What makes it all the more confusing is how NVA and Viet Cong were counted and divided, one of those forces constituted from people in the North and the other force being constituted from the South.

    After the Tet Offensive the Viet Cong were utterly decimated (despite their apparent success) and were basically rebuilt by the NVA forces.

    Second how many people did the US forces kill? Well the estimates that you can read, at least from point of view, are exceedingly low. US bombing is estimated to have killed 50-65k, whilst US forces are estimated at killing just 5,500-10,000 which in my mind is ridiculously low.

    Look at the number of US military war dead, 58,318 were killed by NVA and Viet Cong forces. The idea that 543,000 only killed 10,000 enemy is just ridiculous. Considering the force multipler I would argue that they killed at least 1m plus NVA, Viet Cong and Chinese troops.

    Combine that with the atrocioities committed by ARVN forces, and the bombing and chemical warfare several million civilians were killed, bringing the total to around 3-4 million.

    • Which was horrible, but given the times – expressed desire and real actions to spread Communism throughout Asia and indeed around around world, it is understandable why we did what we did. Why we formulated the policies of Containment and The Domino Theory.

      Who knows. Had we not confronted China and the Soviet Union, many more millions might have died in many more wars. Or been subjugated. That would include a possible attempt by the USSR to invade Western Europe, and China to invade its neighbors. By showing resolve in Korea, Vietnam, elsewhere, we showed Moscow and Beijing that their plans would be confronted by a free and powerful West. A West led by America willing to take forcible action. I believe that stopped their adventurism – stopped their attempts to take over many parts of the world.

      As with everything else, we need to evaluate the reality of the times as well as perceived and real political and military threats posed by our adversaries. That’s why we fought in Vietnam. That’s one reason (along with Korea, NATO, a strong U.S. military, etc.) that Communist expansion was stopped dead in its tracks.

      If you are European or Asian, thank America that you are free. Had it not been for us, many of you would not be today. Need I name the countries that fell under forced Communist domination post-WW2? Need I speak to the suffering of millions because of it? A fair-minded person understands. Vietnam was NOT a mistake. It was a natural consequence of the times.

    • “Combine that with the atrocities committed by ARVN forces …”.

      You failed to mention the horrendous atrocities perpetrated by the NVA, Viet Cong, Chinese. The ARVN wasn’t alone in their war crimes. Not by a long shot.

  3. I don’t get the hate. It seems like this is some generic 3-4th generation plane that will get progressive bolt on upgrades that will eventually make it gen 4.5. Maybe these will become the missle carriers for the j-31s in the future… who knows?

Comments are closed.