Supposed Third Prototype of China’s J-36 Next-Generation Jet has Flown

Published on: December 26, 2025 at 11:41 AM
An image appeared on Dec. 25, 2025, which Chinese military aviation observers have claimed to show the J-36’s third prototype. (Image credit: Chinese internet)

The supposed third J-36 prototype emerged exactly a year after the first one was spotted in December 2024.

Chinese military aviation observers observed what they believe to be a third prototype of the J-36 next-generation aircraft, after photos and videos of it flying overhead emerged on the afternoon of Dec. 25, 2025. They have also maintained this is the aircraft’s first test flight, with a J-10C seen flying beside it as a safety chase aircraft.

Leading Chinese military analyst Andreas Rupprecht said: “Apparently this year China‘s Christmas surprise is not a super-fancy new type, but – itself most impressive – the maiden flight of the third J-36 prototype.” Should the J-36’s third prototype be confirmed, China would now have a total of five next-generation tailless aircraft, including the three J-36 prototypes, the Shenyang J-XDS/J-50, and a third unidentified jet.

It appears that Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC), the facilities where the J-36 is frequently photographed, has concurrently produced three prototypes with different configurations of the engines’ intake and exhaust, the landing gear, along with possibly a host of other unidentified avionics, sensors and software modifications to reduce the time required before the serial production and operational fielding.

Given the health of China’s economy, self-sustaining defense industrial base, and all-domestic aerospace supply chains, the huge financial and logistical cost of pursuing five next-generation jets must be negligible for Beijing. This would otherwise be extremely prohibitive for many countries already struggling to sustain their existing fighter fleets.

We also do not know whether these new Chinese jets can be called 6th generation, as we had explained before. In fact, the classification is still a subject of military and engineering debate, largely emanating from defense marketing campaigns.

A jet could be anywhere between a Gen. 5+ or Gen. 6, depending on who you ask. What needs to be noted nevertheless is the consistent, steady emergence of new aircraft and weapons from Chinese factories, which has a PR motive in itself to display China’s technological prowess.

Third J-36 prototype

We can see little differences between the second and the third prototype, mainly owing to the low resolution of the image that has been taken from a considerable distance and thus doesn’t show any features of the engine intakes and the underside. The aircraft appears to retain the 2D-thrust vectoring control (TVC) nozzles that end before the wing’s trailing edge, as seen in the second prototype that appeared on Oct. 28.

That second prototype, as we noted in our coverage here at The Aviationist, beside the 2D-TVCs, was also differentiated by the main landing gear being in a side-by-side arrangement, rather than the tandem configuration like the first prototype, and revised side intakes with possibly a Diverterless Supersonic Intake (DSI) configuration, instead of the caret-shaped ones on the first.

A comparison between the first (bottom) and second (top) prototypes of the J-36. The main differences are highlighted in red. (Image credit: Chinese internet)

In the newest prototype, the landing gear is also retracted, so we are unable to see if that feature has been altered in any way. Another distinguishing feature is that the third prototype is missing a flight data probe on the nose, seen prominently in the first two J-36 aircraft, although this doesn’t indicate whether the jet is closer to serial production.

The jet’s tactical role is also an area of speculation. The J-36 is so far believed to be anywhere between a heavy-fighter, firing a volley of extremely long-range AAMs like the PL-15 and PL-17, and an extremely stealthy surface-strike weapon, taking out strategic targets.

We asked Rupprecht about what differentiates this third J-36 prototype from the others, and he told us “there don‘t seem to be any differences – maybe the already no longer attached pitot.” However, he also said the info about the third prototype “comes from credible posters, thumbs are usually very credible in telling things around CAC and are said to know even more.”

Closer look at the J-36’s exhausts

March and November also saw the emergence of rear-aspect images of the J-36’s first and second prototypes, respectively, which need some attention, especially amid China also parallely churning new jet engines. The image in March showed the first J-36’s exhausts reasonably clearly, showing recessed-like arrangement similar to that on the YF-23.

The November image of the second J-36’s showed the TVCs and the split trailing edges. The exhausts appear similar to a composite material casing seen on the F-22 Raptor, and were also clearly visible on the stunningly and surprisingly clear image of the J-XDS that appeared while it was taxiing. These exhausts do appear to share the 2D top and bottom composite TVCs seen on an exhibition display of the “Taihang” WS-10 late in September.

An image that appeared in November showing a rear aspect view of the J-36’s second prototype. (Image credit: Chinese Internet)

TVCs for a large tri-engine jet like the J-36 could make up for lack of aerodynamic maneuverability arising from an unstable tailless design. However, a 2D TVC however operates only in the ‘pitch’ and ‘roll’ axes of flight, and not the ‘yaw’ axis which could be covered only with a 3D TVC and could be useful for a tailless aircraft.

Thus, an explanation could be that the composite TVCs mainly have an infrared signature-reducing role. Conical exhausts also offer greater thrust outputs, although pure speed might not be a priority for the J-36’s intended mission set.

Early in November, images also emerged of a presentation slide that suggested China had completed ground tests of its own Adaptive Cycle Engine (ACE), similar to GE Aerospace’s XA102 and Pratt & Whitney XA103, one of which might power the F-47 NGAD (Next-Generation Air Dominance) fighter. Adaptive cycle engines introduce a third stream of airflow and adjust the bypass ratio, allowing the pilot to choose fuel-efficient or performance efficiency modes.

Share This Article
Follow:
Parth Satam's career spans a decade and a half between two dailies and two defense publications. He believes war, as a human activity, has causes and results that go far beyond which missile and jet flies the fastest. He therefore loves analyzing military affairs at their intersection with foreign policy, economics, technology, society and history. The body of his work spans the entire breadth from defense aerospace, tactics, military doctrine and theory, personnel issues, West Asian, Eurasian affairs, the energy sector and Space.
Leave a comment