494FS deployment to Decimomannu – part 3 February 4, 2011
Posted by David Cenciotti in 494FS Deci, Aviation, Italian Air Force, Military Aviation.Tags: 48FW, 494FS, 4° Stormo, AV-8B, C-160, Decimomannu, F-15E, F-2000, Harrier, Italian Navy, Luftwaffe, Marina Militare, RAF Lakenheath, Reparto Sperimentale e di Standardizzazione del Tiro Aereo, RSSTA, Strike Eagle, Typhoon
1 comment so far
More pictures taken at Deci during the 494th FS detachment on Feb. 1 – 2.
494FS deployment to Decimomannu – part 2 February 3, 2011
Posted by David Cenciotti in 494FS Deci, Aviation, Italian Navy, Military Aviation.Tags: 48FW, 494FS, 4° Stormo, AV-8B, C-160, Decimomannu, F-15E, F-2000, Harrier, Italian Navy, Luftwaffe, Marina Militare, RAF Lakenheath, Reparto Sperimentale e di Standardizzazione del Tiro Aereo, RSSTA, Strike Eagle, Typhoon
1 comment so far
On Feb. 1 and 2 I visited Decimomannu airbase, in Sardinia, to see the 494th FS detachment at work. Below you can find some of the pictures I took there. More pictures will be uploaded in the next days. Interestingly, the F-15E performed two daily waves, almost always launching up to 10 aircraft that flew A/G missions in the Capo Frasca range or A/A missions in the restricted areas located to the East of Sardinia. On Feb. 2, the Strike Eagles performed DACT (Dissimilar Air Combat Training) vs the Italian F-2000 Typhoons of the 4° Stormo, based in Grosseto. Deployed to Deci in these days are also 7 AV-8B+ Harrier of the I GrupAer of the Marina Militare (Italian Navy).
Flying the S.79 over the Mediterranean Sea (the Damned Hunchback vs Royal Navy in WWII) January 14, 2011
Posted by David Cenciotti in Aviation, Italian Air Force, Military Aviation, Military History.Tags: 32° Stormo, 5° Stormo, Admiral Andrew Cunningham, Admiral Somerville, Aeronautica Militare, aircraft carrier, AMI, Armando Boetto, Battle off the Galite Island, biplanes, Breda 25, Cagliari-Elmas, Caproni 133, CR-42, Damned Hunchback, Decimomannu, Dive Bombing Training Unit, Fairey Fulmar, Fiat, Fiat CR32, Fiat-Ansaldo A.S.1, Force H, Giuseppe Cenni, Gobbo Maledetto, Hawker Hurricane, HMS Argus, HMS Ark Royal, hydro-racer, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Luigi Gastaldello, Macchi, Macchi 202, Macchi 205, Marina Militare, Military Aviation, Naval Aviation, Nucleo Addestramento Tiro a Tuffo, Operation “Tiger”, Reggiane Re-2002, Regia Aeronautica, Royal Italian Air Force, Royal Navy, S-79, S-81, Savoia Marchetti, SM-84, Spanish Civil Wa, Sparviero, Stefano Cagna, torpedo bombers, War in the Mediterranean Sea, WWII
add a comment
Nicknamed “Gobbo Maledetto” (Italian for “Damned Hunchback”) for its distinctive fuselage “hump”, the S.79 “Sparviero” is one of the most famous Italian aircraft of WWII. It was originally designed as a passenger transport aircraft and was used by the Regia Aeronautica in the bomber and torpedo-bomber roles.
The torpedo bombers had a dangerous mission and suffered heavy losses during the war. S.79s had to fly at low level straight and level towards the ships before the torpedo was launched, and so were targeted by every available anti-aircraft weapon. Many were hit and were compelled to ditch in the Mediterranean Sea, and some of the most heroic actions of the Italian Air Force in WWII were performed by S.79 pilots whose courage was acknowledged by the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy.
Recently Simone Bovi met Luigi Gastaldello, a former S.79 pilot, WWII veteran, in his welcoming house in Vicenza, Italy, where the former pilot of the Italian Air Force (32 years of service, more than 3700 hours of flying, a war on his logbook and the memories of the passage from unstable biplanes to fast jets) recalled the most thrilling missions he flew against the Royal Navy during the Second World War:
The stories from Second Lieutenant Luigi Gastaldello span 32 years of military service, from the early and stagge
ring biplanes to the fast jets era of the Sixties, passing through the worst conflict of the last century: the Second World War, fought against the Allies. Luigi Gastaldello was born in Teolo (Vicenza) on March 7, 1917 and was among the youngest Italian pilots of that time, when in 1936 he achieved a civil pilot license on the monoplane Fiat-Ansaldo A.S.1, an Italian manufactured tourism aircraft which was largely used for training purposes during the Spanish Civil War. The following year, his application to join the Regia Aeronautica (the name of the then Royal Italian Air Force until the collapse of Fascism dictatorship on September 8, 1943) was finally accepted and after a few months of training on the Caproni 133s and Breda 25s aircraft, 2nd Lt. Gastaldello finally obtained his military flying license.
After leaving Grottaglie airbase he was transferred to the 32° Stormo based at Cagliari Elmas (Sardinia), tasked with important duties of Terrestrial and Maritime Bombing. The pre-war period is relatively short and Luigi takes up his days with flying sorties on the Savoia Marchetti S-81s and, from the first months of 1939, on the recently arrived and innovative S-79 Bomber “Sparviero” (the Italian nickname for Sparrow-Hawk). The Sparviero, without any doubt one of the most known Italian aircraft of WWII, was largely involved in aerial actions against the British. This aircraft, indeed, would accompany Luigi throughout his long and brilliant career. Following his memories, I step back to the past.
Pre-War period (1938-1940)
Luigi remembers the pre-war phase as a relatively peaceful period, portrayed with intensive training flights over the Mediterranean Sea (he still remembers about flights that lasted even more than 5 hours each), and day by day he gained major skills on the long-haul navigation and a better knowledge of the new S-79.
Indeed, unlikely its predecessor S-81, the Sparviero was surely more efficient but requested more effort in piloting it since it tended to be strongly instable on haul, especially when passing through moderate and heavy turbulences. During his sorties, Luigi had also the chance to fly and to receive a painstaking training from some fellows who became famous during the late ‘20s and the ‘30s (when they took part in the famous Oceanic fly-over which made some Italian air pioneers very well known worldwide).
Flying against the British
After the declaration of war of June 10, 1940 against France and Great Britain, the activities suddenly increased for the 32° Stormo. Sardinia, where Luigi was located, quickly became a strategic waypoint for setting up aerial sorties of interdiction against naval enemy activities within a large part of the Mediterranean Sea. After more than 800 flying hours and 70 war sorties seated on his Sparviero, it is easy for Luigi to point out the most dramatic actions he participated to, that still impress him after 70 years.
Facing “Operation Hurry”
Operation Hurry (Aug. 1 – 4, 1940) was a Royal Navy operation whose main purpose was to ferry 12 Hawker Hurricane aircraft to Malta, where they were desperately needed to reinforce the island’s defences.
The operation involved almost all the British warship in the Mediterranean, from both Admiral Andrew Cunningham’s fleet at Alexandria and Admiral Somerville’s Force H at Gibraltar whose aim was preventing the Italian Air Force and Navy from attacking Force H, which was escorting the carrier HMS Argus. On the first day of the Operation, 2nd Lt. Gastaldello witnessed the battle against the British. “We were scrambled from Decimomannu and headed to the Balearic Islands after being warned of the presence of a large British convoy navigating out there. We were a total of 25 planes without any fighter escort or the support of the Navy. I was flying at the head of a formation of five S-79s and in front of us there was another three ship formation led by General Stefano Cagna. I still remember it was about 3:30 pm with good visibility when we spotted out the enemy convoy around 90km off the coast of Formentera.
I was able to count up to twenty ships when they furiously started to shoot, with shocking and loud explosions below us. Since we knew that British anti-aircraft cannons could generally reach the higher altitude of 4.000 meters, during that mission we kept flying at 4.200 metres, in order to remain out of their maximum reach. But at that height it was not easy for us to fly for long periods…since our aircraft were not equipped with oxygen masks at all! Approaching our target, the crew on board started the preparation to drop our load (generally only consisting of four bombs of 250kg each). I was alone in flight deck since my Commander had left his seat to move down to the central hold of the plane in order to activate the bombing pointing device. Suddenly I saw the Sparviero piloted by General Cagna in front of me, heading nose-down towards the target being hit by antiaircraft artillery and exploding in mid-air.
Instinctively I pulled up my plane and doing so I managed to avoid the largest mass of debris coming all around me from the explosion, even tough some of them hit my plane. [Luigi Gastaldello still keeps jealously in his house a piece of metal fragment that was taken out from his wounded plane]. In spite of the severe damage suffered, we continued our mission and, after dropping our bombs, we recomposed the formation and returned to the base. The epilogue of our mission was the loss of three planes and many others being damaged. Instead, our damage to the enemy was relatively poor because of the inaccuracy of high altitude bombing against fast moving targets. The only successful goal we achieved was to obtain clear aerial photographs that were sent on the same evening to the Air Force Headquarters in Rome. There, the analysts realized how the aerial bombing against moving naval units brought poor effects and posed high risks for our aviators”. Obviously this was not enough to change right away the whole bombing strategy.
This came only a few months later even if the origin of such a change could be traced back to the aftermaths of the Battle of Balearic Islands. It was only from the last months of 1940 on that a new version of the S-79 was employed as a torpedo bomber. This change of strategy in bombing enemy ships implied significant improvements: Italian pilots finally gained a better consideration from the British Naval Commanders who, from that moment on, nicknamed the new S-79 as the “Gobbo Maledetto” (Damned Hunchback).
Saved by the clouds
“Another action which is still clearly impressed in my mind is the Battle off the Galite Islands, located at 38 km northwest of the Tunisian coast and 150km south of Cape Spartivento (Sardinia)”. The battle fell within the large Operation “Tiger”, by which the British urgently sent 5 supply convoys from Gibraltar to Alexandria, in order to strengthen up the besieged forces commanded by General Wavell. The convoy was escorted by the carrier HMS Ark Royal, the cruisers HMS Renown and Sheffield and 9 battle destroyers.
“It was May 8, 1941 when we were ordered to take off from Decimomannu and had to face off some enemy naval units that were escorting a large supply convoy”. On that morning the weather was poor, with low clouds and showers. The fierce guests forced the pilots to make continuous trim corrections to maintain the right course: below the sea had a leaden look. As we approached the target, tension on board was rising. No words, only glances between the crew and the constant search for something out there, either ships or enemy fighters. “Finally, at around midday we located the enemy and immediately started to aim at a British cruiser on escort. We could not ask for a better position for an air attack: the sun on our shoulders and the naval artillery that was not even firing a single shot”. “We descended to lower altitudes but as the crew was activating the pointing device and dropped the first bomb, our target suddenly changed its course to the left. It is unnecessary to say that our bomb splashed heavily into the water! From that moment on, the enemy artillery unleashed all their fire mouths! There were explosions everywhere around us and from the initial formation of five, only two of us managed to come back to the base. We were also attacked on our way back when a lonely Hurricane spotted us and repeatedly shot enraged bursts that fortunately missed our aircraft for no more than 5 meters.
Then I immediately diverted my plane into a large and thick formation of clouds after having dropped the remaining bombs: this maneuver meant our salvation”. On that day, a Fairey Fulmar piloted by Nigel George “Buster” and accompanied by the Australian observer Sir Victor Alfred Tumper Smith managed to shot down the S-79 of Captain Armando Boetto, who perished in the incident with the rest of the crew. During the clashes, the Fulmar was also heavily hit by the Italian gunners and was forced to splashdown into the water, where his crew was later rescued by the Royal Navy. Indeed, in honor of Captain Armando Boetto, the 32° Stormo of Italian Air Force is currently named after him. 
The above stories underline once again how the early bombing conducted by the Regia Aeronautica on mobile targets was ineffective. This ineffectiveness depended on various factors. It is worth to be highlighted that during the Mediterranean Sea battles, the S-79s crews could almost only rely on their abilities. Their aircraft were not equipped with oxygen masks or radio communication. The Sparviero could transport up to 5 250Kg bombs but the crew tended to bring in action only 4 of them, in order to gain more maneuverability. The defensive armament was exclusively made of 3 12,7mm Breda-SAFAT machine guns and a fourth 7,7mm Lewis located in the middle of the fuselage.
Luigi Gastaldello was also witness of the poor coordination that wafted into the strategy rooms: “A few days after the Battle of Galite Island I was ordered by the Commander in Chief to be ready for a night mission: destination Balearic Islands, and our target would have been the HMS carrier “Ark Royal”. My aircraft was the only one planned for the mission, without any support by the fighters or the Navy! Fortunately, one hour before the scheduled takeoff the mission was cancelled”.
Stukas and Sicily
The war actions for 2nd Lt. Luigi Gastaldello did not stop with the S-79s. By the second half of 1941 he and his Squadron moved to Bologna to test the new Savoia Marchetti SM-84, where, in spite of the big expectations, the aircraft will turn out to be less effective than his predecessor S-79.
On December of the same year Luigi Gastaldello also flew with the 101st Squadron “Nucleo Addestramento Tiro a Tuffo” (Dive Bombing Training Unit) at Lonate Pozzolo (Varese) on the JU87s Stuka, but no significant war actions are worth to be remarked. Starting from March 1942 he moved back to Gela (Sicily) and to Ciampino (Rome) on the following month. There, he was enlisted in the 1st Experimental Unit, where he tested the new attack aircraft RO-57 and managed also to obtain qualifications on Macchi 202s, 205s, CR-42s and Fiat G-50s. After the establishment of the 97th Interception Squadron equipped with RO-57s, Luigi was moved again to Crotone (Calabria) on June 1943 and employed with defence tasks against the foreseen Allied invasion.
“I remember on a muggy day of July at Crotone airfield, I was lining up my RO-57 on the runway ready for a desperate sortie with a single 500kg bomb, when I received the counter order to suspend the mission…maybe in Rome someone realized the inutility of throwing ourselves into the fray by facing a huge armada untenable for us”. During that summer many were the losses suffered by the 5° Stormo. On Jul. 11, the whole Squadron engaged the naval units off the coast of Augusta, destroying the steamer “Talamba” but suffering the loss of four aircraft, including the Unit Commander Colonel Guido Nobili. Two days later another clash against the Allies was conducted by eleven Reggiane Re 2002s and brought to the damage of battleship “Nelson”. The unit was forced to retreat to Malta after having suffered heavy structural damage. Although this minimal success, a couple of Italian planes were shot down. The surviving pilots, just after their landing at Crotone airfield, also underwent a heavy bombing by large formations of US Liberators. The action caused the partial destruction of the runway and the loss of men and aircraft on ground. “I still remember a summer evening, when I was coming back to my dormitory after a bloody action founding myself alone! No one of my comrades was left after weeks of terrible battles”. 
A few days before the collapse of Italian Dictatorship on September 8, 1943, Luigi Gastaldello was obliged by the events to retreat northbound to Tarquinia (near Rome), flying a Macchi 205. “It was my first time on board this new aircraft and I was not really used with the controls and gauges. Moreover our airfield had suffered many bombardments by the Allied, the last one a few hours before I had been ordered to retreat and fly away the M-205. The runway was disseminated with warning flags indicating unexploded bombs, craters and holes. This was not really a gentle takeoff! After pushing the throttle onwards I started again to breathe when my plane lifted off that damned runway!”. On September the British landed in Calabria as the pilots of the 5° Stormo were still flying and fighting. On Sept. 4 even the newly promoted Maj. Giuseppe Cenni perished during an air battle over the Aspromonte Mountains. Some witnesses on the ground spotted his lonely Re 2002 being attacked by a lot of Spitfires. He was putting every effort in order to defend himself and his plane; he grazed the mountaintops and trees combined with fast changes of maneuver, but the British were too many and Cenni’s aircraft was seen falling into a deep valley. Four days later, the armistice was signed. During the last two months the 5° Stormo had lost more than 20 pilots and almost all their aircraft. During three years of war 57 pilots had been killed in action and 73 was the total amount of destroyed airplanes.
After Sept. 8 the Italian Armed Forces collapsed and Luigi, as many others soldiers did, felt the need to meet up with his family. He then managed to reach his native town of Teolo and there, with frequent displacements helped by acquaintances, he avoided the capture and deportation by the Germans.
Still in service
After WWII the carreer as pilot for Luigi Gastaldello was far from being over. He took service at Pisa, where he obtained the qualification on Beechcraft C-45 “Expeditor” and Fiat G-12 transportation aircraft.
During the fifties Luigi Gastaldello was mainly committed with night sorties and flights to test the innovative aids for instrumental navigation, but qualifications on different aircraft were still on the way: S-7, Fiat G-46, Piaggio 148, Fiat G-59, Macchi 416 and the P-51 Mustang, after this type entered in service with the new Italian Air Force. In 1959 Luigi finally moved back to northeastern Italy and there, between a liaison flight and another, he still had time to obtain his last qualification on Lockheed T-33. He retired in 1968.
How to Fly the Harrier Jump Jet | Danger Room | Wired.com December 22, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Aircraft Carriers, Italian Navy, Military Aviation.Tags: AV-8B, F-35, F-35 Lightning II, F-35B, Harrier, JSF, Jump Jet, Lockheed Martin, Marina Militare, Military Aviation, NATOPS, Naval Aviation, Short Take-Off Vertical Landing, STOVL
add a comment
A few days ago, I published a post to explain how the F-35 JSF flies in both conventional and STOVL (Short Take Off Vertical Landing) Harrier-like mode. The following article provides some interesting info and images about the AV-8B, a version much similar to the one flown by the Marina Militare (Italian Navy):
The Harrier made its final flight with the British RAF last week, marking one end to the jet famous for being able to take off and land vertically. The jet’s recently declassified flight manual shows just how extraordinary it is.
read the rest here: How to Fly the Harrier Jump Jet | Danger Room | Wired.com.
Aircraft carriers with no aircraft….. December 22, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Aviation, Italian Air Force, Italian Navy, Military Aviation.Tags: 5th generation fighter, Aeronautica Militare, aircraft carrier, AMI, cat and trap, F-35, F-35 JSF, F-35 Lightning II, F-35B, F-35C, fighter pilot, Greg Bagwell, Grottaglie airbase, Harrier, Harrier GR9, Harrier retirement, I GrupAer, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Italian Navy, Joint Force Harrier, Joint Strike Fighter, Lockheed Martin, Marina Militare, Military Aviation, Naval Aviation, RAF Harrier, Short Take-Off Vertical Landing, STOVL
1 comment so far
The following defense news article deserves a read:
RAF: Harrier Retirement Won’t Hurt F-35C Skills
By ANDREW CHUTER
Published: 17 Dec 2010 08:55
One of Britain’s senior Royal Air Force commanders has rebutted suggestions that retiring the Harrier GR9 will damage the ability to regenerate skills to operate the new F-35C variant of the Joint Strike Fighter off a new aircraft carrier when it enters service around 2020. “Anybody who thinks that operating a Harrier today was somehow going to link you with the F-35C on the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier is [wrong]. It is just not true,” said Air Officer Commanding No. 1 Group Air Vice Marshal Greg Bagwell.
The Harrier is a short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing aircraft, while the F-35C is a conventional aircraft requiring catapults and arrestor wires to operate. The latter aircraft is destined to be used on the new 65,000-ton carriers now being built by a BAE Systems-led alliance. Britain originally intended to acquire the STOVL F-35B version of the Joint Strike Fighter, but as part of the strategic defense and security review in October opted to switch to the conventional F-35C variant. At the same time, the British government decided to immediately ax the joint RAF/Royal Navy Harrier GR9 force and decommission the aircraft carrier Ark Royal, leaving Britain without a maritime air strike capability until 2020, when the F-35C and the Queen Elizabeth-class warship are available. Britain’s joint force of 79 Royal Air Force and Royal Navy Harrier GR9′s aircraft took off into retirement Nov. 15 from their base at Cottesmore in eastern England and will now be scrapped, unless they can be sold or a new use for them is found. The Daily Telegraph newspaper said earlier this week the MoD was looking at a proposal to create a reserve squadron using the Harriers. The decision to decommission the Harrier and the Ark Royal has caused huge controversy, in part because its opponents say it will be difficult to regain the skills needed to run carrier strike operations in the future. Bagwell said he does not underestimate the challenges and risks involved in building the F-35C operation, but he thinks the RAF and the RN forces would have faced the issue regardless of whether the Harrier had stayed in service.
“The techniques and procedures to recover a conventional carrier aircraft using catapult launches and arrestor gear recoveries, or ‘cats and traps,’ are totally different from that of a STOVL aircraft,” he said. “That is just as true for the aircrew as it is for the ships crew. Whilst the Harrier would have preserved the requisite skill sets for the F35B STOVL variant of the Joint Combat Aircraft” – the name the British called their JSF program – “they are largely irrelevant to that needed to operate the F35C.
“Effectively, we need to build the skill sets for the new aircraft and carrier configuration from scratch. We all ready have plans in place to begin that build up over the next 10 years with our allies and partners.” He said it was a “tall order,” but regaining carrier skills is a problem Britain had previously faced and overcome. One senior Royal Navy commander agreed with Bagwell’s assessment and said there was a much bigger question mark over regaining deck skills than the capabilities of pilots Bagwell, who commands all of Britain’s fast jet operations, said the RAF and the RN “have 10 years to get our act in gear and understand what operating the F-35C variant means for training and other preparation. Some we will have to learn from the USA and France,” he said. The British already have a pilot exchange program with the U.S. with officers flying carrier operations with the F-18. Bagwell said he was confident British pilots would also be flying French Navy jets as well “We will be flying Rafales from French carriers within a few years. I’m sure of it,” he said.
The British are targeting the availability of a single squadron of F-35Cs by 2020 to equip a joint RAF/RN operation. Briefing reporters last week, Bagwell said that would require an initial order for about 40 aircraft. How the aircraft will be employed in the future has yet to be worked out, but said he thought the aircraft would not be tied to the aircraft carrier. “They are there to project air power. It’s irrelevant where they are launched from. The Royal Navy will hate me for this, but sometimes they will be launched from the deck of an aircraft carrier for good reason. Other times it will be in-country closer to the problem,” he said. Either way, he said the F-35C gave the British better deep penetration, ISTAR and other capabilities than the more limited STOVL F-35B.
Anything weird? Apparently, not. As Bagwell affirms, the Harrier could not contribute to generate the skills required to fly the F-35C since the conventional carrier variant has not a STOVL (Short Take Off Vertical Landing) capability. Right. Unfortunately, what must be underlined is that Britain had originally chosen the STOVL variant before the Strategic Defense and Security Review in October deciced to switch to the C variant making the Harrier GR9s APPARENTLY useless. It’s a matter of logic: the Harrier was not scrapped because of the C variant; the C variant was chosen because the Harrier was sacrificed (along with the Ark Royal aircraft carrier). With this decision, UK will not have aircraft to equip aircraft carriers until 2020. Since the development of the F-35 is taking more than expeceted in both terms of time and costs, was this the right pick? I don’t think so.
Below, a of RN Sea Harrier FA.2
Two RAF Harrier GR7s (the left one photographed during an air-to-air refueling mission on board a Spanish KC-130 from Aviano in 2000; the right one taking off during RIAT 2002).
Is it Italy facing the same risk? Absolutely not. The current scenario offers just two options for the Italian Navy that can’t afford building a new catapult-equipped aircraft carrier in the short-mid period:
1) the F-35B is axed and the I GrupAer AV-8B+ will keep flying from the Cavour aircraft carrier until the aircraft lifetime expires
2) the Italian Harriers are replaced by the STOVL F-35B as soon as it becomes available.
Below, AV-8B+ Harrier of the Marina Militare refueling from a B707 tanker.
The F-35B heating problems November 24, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Military Aviation.Tags: Aeronautica Militare, aircraft carrier, AMI, AV-8B, F-35 Lightning II, F-35B, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Marina Militare, Military Aviation, Naval Aviation, Short Take-Off Vertical Landing, STOVL, USMC
1 comment so far
In the last few days, I’ve often written about the F-35B. I have explained that the STOVL concept could not be abandoned and that, hopefully, USMC, Italian Air Force and Italian Navy, will most probably get their Harrier replacements sooner or later. However I forgot to complete the previous sentence: “hopefully, USMC, Italian Air Force and Italian Navy, will most probably get their Harrier replacements sooner or later provided that
Lockheed Martin will be able to solve the heating management issues. Over the last couple of years, the US Navy has in fact discovered that the engine exhaust from the F-35B (and also from the tilt-rotor MV-22) was too hot for the deck plates on some on the carriers and that high temperatures could deform the deck plate’s understructure.
Below is an interesting article published on Aviation Week’s blog Ares by Bill Sweetman that clearly explains the type of problem the F-35B users could be facing because of the high temperatures and high jet exhaust speed of the STOVL variant of the Lightning II. If the heating problem is not solved, the F-35B will not be able to operate from unprepared strip or aircraft carrier, becoming almost useless (at least for the requirements it was expected to satisfy).
About That Austere-Base Thing…
Posted by Bill Sweetman at 3/11/2010 6:45 AM CST
In operations around Marjah in Afghanistan, the Marines have been using
AV-8B Harriers as they were designed to be used, flying the jets from
runways that are too short or ill-prepared to accommodate a conventional
fighter. Kimberly Johnson is reporting on this for DTI’s April issue.The Marines say that the the AV-8B’s replacement, the F-35B Joint Strike
Fighter, will be able to do the same: “The flexibility that the STOVL
variant of the F-35 will add to the contemporary Marine Air Ground Task
Force is amazing,” Marine commandant Gen James Conway said when the first
F-35B was rolled out, more than two years ago. “This generational leap in
technology will enable us to operate a fleet of fighter/attack aircraft from
the decks of ships, existing runways or from unimproved surfaces at austere
bases.”But a Navy report issued in January says that the F-35B, in fact, won’t be
able to use such forward bases. Indeed, unless it ditches its short
take-off, vertical landing capability and touches down like a conventional
fighter, it won’t be able to use land bases at all without some major
construction efforts.The newly released document, hosted on a government building-design resource
site, outlines what base-construction engineers need to do to ensure that
the F-35B’s exhaust does not turn the surface it lands on into an
area-denial weapon. And it’s not trivial. Vertical-landing “pads will be
exposed to 1700 deg. F and high velocity (Mach 1) exhaust,” the report says.
The exhaust will melt asphalt and “is likely to spall the surface of
standard airfield concrete pavements on the first VL.” (The report leaves to
the imagination what jagged chunks of spalled concrete will do in a
supersonic blast field.)Not only does the VL pad have to be made of heat-resistant concrete, but
currently known sealants can’t stand the heat either, so the pad has to be
one continuous piece of concrete, with continuous reinforcement in all
directions so that cracks and joints remain closed. The reinforced pad has
to be 100 feet by 100 feet, with a 50-foot paved area around it.By the way, any area where an F-35B may be stopped with the engine running -
runway ends, hold-shorts on taxiways, and ramps – also has to be made of
heat-resistant concrete to tolerate the exhaust from the Integrated Power
Pack (IPP), which is acting as a small gas turbine whenever the aircraft is
stopped.This follows the revelation that the US Navy is worried about the exhaust
damaging ship decks.Lockheed Martin pooh-poohs the report, saying that it was based on
“worst-case” data and that “extensive tests” conducted with prototype BF-3
in January (after the report was completed) showed that “the difference
between F-35B main-engine exhaust temperature and that of the AV-8B is very
small, and is not anticipated to require any significant CONOPS changes for
F-35B.”What do “very small” and “significant” mean? In VL mode the main engine on
the F-35B is producing some 15,700 pounds of thrust, while a Harrier’s aft
nozzles deliver about 12,000 pounds of thrust. (The fore-aft split is
roughly equal.)But the F135′s overall pressure ratio is almost twice as high, which would
point to a much higher jet velocity (which LockMart doesn’t mention), the
JSF nozzle is much closer to the ground, and the Harrier has two nozzles,
several feet apart.So maybe the F-35B is not shaping up to be the best anti-runway weapon since
the RAF retired the JP233. However, it may still not be what the Marines got
when they first acquired the Harrier in the early 1970s.Having clung tenaciously to the WW2-era AU-1 Corsair until the late 1950s,
because unlike early jets it could use minimally improved fields, the
Marines had finally entered the jet age with the help of the Short Airfield
for Tactical Support (SATS), an astonishing set of equipment that included a
portable water-brake arrester system and (I am not making this up) a
catapult powered by J79 jet engines.The original Harrier allowed them to get rid of this kit. While the first
justification for land-based STOVL – that it provided a dispersal
alternative when air attacks shut down major bases – has a Cold War feel to
it, the idea of using STOVL as a more expeditionary force has remained
somewhat valid, and has been used by both the UK and the Marines: the RAF’s
Harriers were able to operate from Kandahar when other aircraft could not.Again, the question is how well the F-35B will be able to do that, and what
“significant ” means. Worst case or not, there is a very big difference
between a solid slab of high-grade concrete and the kind of surface you are
apt to find anywhere ending in -stan.
The (un)certain future of the F-35B November 21, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Italian Air Force, Italian Navy, Military Aviation.Tags: Aeronautica Militare, aircraft carrier, Cavour aircraft carrier, conventional takeoff and landing, CTOL, Department of Defense, DoD, F-35, F-35B, Israeli Air Force, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Italian Navy, Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force, Joint Strike Fighter, JSF, Landing Helicopter Assault, Landing Helicopter Dock, LHA, LHD, Lockheed Martin, low-rate initial production, LRIP, Marina Militare, Marine Expeditionary Unit, MEU, Military Aviation, Naval Aviation, RAF, Short Take-Off Vertical Landing, Spanish Navy, STOVL, USAF, USMC, USMC Harriers
15 comments
Just a few days ago I wrote that, should Italy be forced to choose a single F-35 variant because of budget costraints (as happened in the UK), the hypothesis of selecting the F-35Bs for both the Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force, ItAF) and the Marina Militare (Italian Navy, ItNy) should be seriously taken into consideration (for more details read here: “F-35, STOVL, Joint Force: will Italy follow the British path?“). However, on Nov. 11, 2010, an interesting article available on DefPro titled “Deficit Commission: Cancel Marine Corps Version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and Several Other Weapons” explained that a bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform had just issued a series of draft proposals to cut government spending; among which, one of the most interesting is to cancel the Marine Corps version of the F-35. This option would not only cancel the Marine Corps version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter “because of its technical problems, cost overruns, schedule delays, and the adoption by the services of joint combat support in current wartime operations” but would leave Italy, that saw the F-35 as the ideal Harrier replacement, without aircraft for its Cavour aircraft carrier. Should the F-35B be canceled, the Italian partecipation in the JSF programme would be at risk since the carrier was tailored to this aircraft and could not be converted to accomodate the F-35C carrier version. The only alternative to the F-35B would be to extend the service life of the AV-8B, more or less the same option available for the USMC. However, I think that the STOVL (Short Take Off Vertical Landing) version of the 5th generation aircraft will not be scratched for many reasons:
1) the F-35B is going to replace not only the USMC Harriers but also the F/A-18 to cover the full spectrum of modern warfare scenarios with its own resources: not only CAS (Close Air Support) but also air superiority and strike missions. The Marine Corps needs a fixed wing aircraft operating from a LHA (Landing Helicopter Assault) or LHD (Landing Helicopter Dock) to support a MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit) in regional crisis and a STOVL is the only viable option.
2) the entire America class amphibious assault ships were designed to accomodate, operate and support the F-35B and, to increase the number of accommodated aircraft, it will not feature the well decks that are used to house landing craft on the Tarawa and Wasp class amphibious assault ships.
Fortunately, to reassure the Italian Navy (the Italian Air Force and, especially, USMC….), on Jun. 19, 2010, Lockheed was awarded 3.5 billion USD contract modification from the U.S. Department of Defense to manufacture 31 F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters in the fourth lot of low-rate initial production (LRIP). “The contract also funds manufacturing-support equipment, flight test instrumentation and ancillary mission equipment. Including the long-lead funding previously received, the total contract value for LRIP 4 is $3.9 billion. Under the contract, Lockheed Martin will produce 10 F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variants for the U.S. Air Force, 16 F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing variants for the U.S. Marine Corps, four F-35C carrier variants for the U.S. Navy and one F-35B for the United Kingdom. Additionally, the Netherlands has the option to procure one F-35A”.
Even if the British F-35Bs funded in LRIP 3 and 4 when the MoD was expecting to order the B model will be most probably sold to the USMC, the contract awarded by the US DoD gives those air forces interested in the STOVL version of the JSF (Italian Navy, Italian Air Force, Israeli Air Force and possibly the Spanish Navy and the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force) a reason to be highly optimistic about the future of the F-35B.
Departures from Circus Maximus (in bad weather) November 14, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Armed Forces Day, Military Aviation.Tags: A129, AB-212, AB-412, Aeronautica Militare, AMI, Armed Forces Day, AW139, Carabinieri, CH-47, Chinook, Circus Maximus, EH-101, Esercito Italiano, flight clothing, flight gear, Guardia Costiera, Guardia di Finanza, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Italian Army, Italian Navy, Marina Militare
add a comment
Below, the pictures of the departures from the static display at the Circus Maximus for the Armed Forces Day, taken on Nov. 10, 2010, by Giovanni Maduli.
Circus Maximus exhibition (for the Armed Forces Day 2010) November 12, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Armed Forces Day, Aviation.Tags: A129, AB-212, Aeronautica Militare, aircraft carrier, AMI, Armed Forces Day, AW139, Carabinieri, CH-47, Chinook, Circus Maximus, Esercito Italiano, flight clothing, flight gear, Guardia Costiera, Guardia di Finanza, ItAF, Italian Air Force, Italian Army, Italian Navy, Marina Militare
4 comments
The Italian Armed Forces celebrated the 92nd Anniversary since the end of WWI and the Armed Forces Day with the traditional exhibition in the Circus Maximus (Circo Massimo) in Rome with weapons systems and equipment belonging to the Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force), Marina Militare (Italian Navy) and Guardia Costiera (Coast Guard), Esercito Italiano (Italian Army), Guardia di Finanza (Custom Police) and Carabinieri (Military Police). Here are the pictures I and Giovanni Maduli took on Nov. 7, at the exhibition.
Cavour aircraft carrier – Civitavecchia November 8, 2010
Posted by David Cenciotti in Italian Navy, Military Aviation.Tags: aircraft carrier, Armed Forces Day, AV-8B, Cavour, Cavour aircraft carrier, Civitavecchia, Civitavecchia harbour, Grottaglie, Harrier, I GrupAer, Italian Navy, Marina Militare, Military, Military Aviation, Naval Aviation, Nave Cavour, Sea King, SH-3D
2 comments
As happened in 2008 and 2009, once again in 2010, Cavour aircraft carrier was at Civitavecchia harbour for the Armed Forces Day. I went there and made a quick tour of the ship as already done in the previous years and took the following pictures of the AV-8B+ Harrier and SH-3D “Sea King” that were on display on the flight deck of “Nave Cavour”.
A side note that might be useful if you’ll plan to visit the ship next year: the aircraft carrier could be visited from 9AM to 12AM in the morning and from 3PM to 6.30PM. Visitors could reach the ship using one of the shuttle buses which connected the harbour car park with the dock (that were some kilometers apart). Unfortunately, without any prior notice, the buses that should bring the people from the ship back to the car park ceased their service after 12PM leaving hundreds visitors (comprising many infants and elderly people) under the sun, without any other chance than waiting from a few hours or walking for 2,5 chilometers to reach their cars on foot! Thumbs down to the organizers for this unacceptable management of the bus service.
































































































































































